Andries.Brouwer writes:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 08:35:09 2001
>>Andries.Brouwer writes:
>>> What one wants is to remap access to sector 0 to sector 1,
>>> and leave all other sectors alone. Thus, if someone asks
>>> for sectors 0 1 2 3 4, she should get sectors 1 1 2 3 4.
>>
>> No,
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 08:35:09 2001
Andries.Brouwer writes:
> What one wants is to remap access to sector 0 to sector 1,
> and leave all other sectors alone. Thus, if someone asks
> for sectors 0 1 2 3 4, she should get sectors 1 1 2 3 4.
No, because then
Andries.Brouwer writes:
> What one wants is to remap access to sector 0 to sector 1,
> and leave all other sectors alone. Thus, if someone asks
> for sectors 0 1 2 3 4, she should get sectors 1 1 2 3 4.
No, because then you can't write to the real first sector.
Assuming translation is good, 1 0
Andries.Brouwer writes:
What one wants is to remap access to sector 0 to sector 1,
and leave all other sectors alone. Thus, if someone asks
for sectors 0 1 2 3 4, she should get sectors 1 1 2 3 4.
No, because then you can't write to the real first sector.
Assuming translation is good, 1 0 2
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 08:35:09 2001
Andries.Brouwer writes:
What one wants is to remap access to sector 0 to sector 1,
and leave all other sectors alone. Thus, if someone asks
for sectors 0 1 2 3 4, she should get sectors 1 1 2 3 4.
No, because then you
Andries.Brouwer writes:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 08:35:09 2001
Andries.Brouwer writes:
What one wants is to remap access to sector 0 to sector 1,
and leave all other sectors alone. Thus, if someone asks
for sectors 0 1 2 3 4, she should get sectors 1 1 2 3 4.
No, because then you
On Mar 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So yes, the problem is known, but I do not see a clean solution,
> unless the solution is to rip out all this EZ drive nonsense.
Grub can already handle EZ drives itself so this would be a solution :)
However, fdisk depends on the remapping.
> (I can well
Jochen,
I don't really care about Disk Overlays.
However if you can fix it or if Andries can great.
Sorry,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The EZ-Drive remapping code remaps to many sectors, if they are read
> together with sector 0 in one bunch. This is even
Jochen Hoenicke writes:
The EZ-Drive remapping code remaps to many sectors, if they are read
together with sector 0 in one bunch. This is even documented:
From linux-2.4.0/drivers/ide/ide.c line 1165:
/* Yecch - this will shift the entire interval,
possibly killing some
Hello,
The EZ-Drive remapping code remaps to many sectors, if they are read
together with sector 0 in one bunch. This is even documented:
>From linux-2.4.0/drivers/ide/ide.c line 1165:
/* Yecch - this will shift the entire interval,
possibly killing some innocent following sector */
This
Hello,
The EZ-Drive remapping code remaps to many sectors, if they are read
together with sector 0 in one bunch. This is even documented:
From linux-2.4.0/drivers/ide/ide.c line 1165:
/* Yecch - this will shift the entire interval,
possibly killing some innocent following sector */
This
Jochen Hoenicke writes:
The EZ-Drive remapping code remaps to many sectors, if they are read
together with sector 0 in one bunch. This is even documented:
From linux-2.4.0/drivers/ide/ide.c line 1165:
/* Yecch - this will shift the entire interval,
possibly killing some
Jochen,
I don't really care about Disk Overlays.
However if you can fix it or if Andries can great.
Sorry,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
Hello,
The EZ-Drive remapping code remaps to many sectors, if they are read
together with sector 0 in one bunch. This is even
13 matches
Mail list logo
