On Wed 12-06-19 12:36:53, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>
> [ Adding Greg to CC ]
>
> On 6/12/19 6:04 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Tue 11-06-19 15:34:48, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >> On 6/2/19 12:04 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> >>> On 5/30/19 3:45 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
> >> [...]
> At
On 6/12/19 1:36 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>
> [ Adding Greg to CC ]
>
> On 6/12/19 6:04 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Tue 11-06-19 15:34:48, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> On 6/2/19 12:04 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 5/30/19 3:45 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>>> [...]
> At any rate,
> Il giorno 22 mag 2019, alle ore 12:01, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> ha scritto:
>
> On 5/22/19 2:09 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>> First, thank you very much for testing my patches, and, above all, for
>> sharing those huge traces!
>>
>> According to the your traces, the residual 20% lower
On 5/22/19 2:12 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 22 mag 2019, alle ore 11:02, Srivatsa S. Bhat
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> Let's continue here on LKML itself.
>
> Just done :)
>
>> The only reason I created the
>> bugzilla entry is to attach the tarball of the traces, assuming
>> that it
On 5/22/19 2:09 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
> First, thank you very much for testing my patches, and, above all, for
> sharing those huge traces!
>
> According to the your traces, the residual 20% lower throughput that you
> record is due to the fact that the BFQ injection mechanism takes a few
>
> Il giorno 20 mag 2019, alle ore 12:19, Paolo Valente
> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>> Il giorno 18 mag 2019, alle ore 22:50, Srivatsa S. Bhat
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> On 5/18/19 11:39 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> I've addressed these issues in my last batch of improvements for BFQ,
>>> which landed
On Sat 18-05-19 15:28:47, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 08:39:54PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > I've addressed these issues in my last batch of improvements for
> > BFQ, which landed in the upcoming 5.2. If you give it a try, and
> > still see the problem, then I'll be glad to
7 matches
Mail list logo
