On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 17:53 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to point out that Google Chrome also makes use of CONFIG_ tests
> > to detect support for namespaces and pid containers and stuff.
>
> Hmm. It must work fine
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
>
> I'd like to point out that Google Chrome also makes use of CONFIG_ tests
> to detect support for namespaces and pid containers and stuff.
Hmm. It must work fine despite that. Because I run self-compiled
kernels and there are no config
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:17 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
> >
> > I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand
> > whether:
> > a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
> > a
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 15:03 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:25:43PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > And you're now also taking Michael's patch, that triggered this
> > discussion, aren't you?
>
> I believe there is a better way of doing this that I had enumerated
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:25:43PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:02 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > How about I make you proud and post a patch. See:
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/20332
>
> And you're now also taking Michael's
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:02 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> How about I make you proud and post a patch. See:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/20332
And you're now also taking Michael's patch, that triggered this
discussion, aren't you?
Paul Bolle
--
To
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:46:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
> >
> > If life was that simple.. This particular issue was with inhibiting certain
> > config stanzas if certain features were not built in the kernel. Here is the
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> If life was that simple.. This particular issue was with inhibiting certain
> config stanzas if certain features were not built in the kernel. Here is the
> bug that started it:
>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:02:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:40:50AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Hey Linus,
> >
> > I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand
> > whether:
> > a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
>
> I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand whether:
> a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
> a kernel has some CONFIG_X=y feature.
Well, /proc/config.gz is better than
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:40:50AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey Linus,
>
> I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand whether:
> a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
> a kernel has some CONFIG_X=y feature.
>
> b) If they
Hey Linus,
I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand whether:
a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
a kernel has some CONFIG_X=y feature.
b) If they are OK to do so, what do we do when certain CONFIG_X options
get
Hey Linus,
I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand whether:
a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
a kernel has some CONFIG_X=y feature.
b) If they are OK to do so, what do we do when certain CONFIG_X options
get
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:40:50AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey Linus,
I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand whether:
a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
a kernel has some CONFIG_X=y feature.
b) If they are OK
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand whether:
a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
a kernel has some CONFIG_X=y feature.
Well,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:02:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:40:50AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey Linus,
I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand
whether:
a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out whether
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
If life was that simple.. This particular issue was with inhibiting certain
config stanzas if certain features were not built in the kernel. Here is the
bug that started it:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:46:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
If life was that simple.. This particular issue was with inhibiting certain
config stanzas if certain features were not built in the kernel.
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:02 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
How about I make you proud and post a patch. See:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/20332
And you're now also taking Michael's patch, that triggered this
discussion, aren't you?
Paul Bolle
--
To
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:25:43PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 14:02 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
How about I make you proud and post a patch. See:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/20332
And you're now also taking Michael's patch,
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 15:03 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:25:43PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
And you're now also taking Michael's patch, that triggered this
discussion, aren't you?
I believe there is a better way of doing this that I had enumerated
in the
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:17 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
I am hoping you can help me draw an understanding and a line in sand
whether:
a) Tools should not depend on /proc/config.gz to figure out
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Raymond Jennings shent...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to point out that Google Chrome also makes use of CONFIG_ tests
to detect support for namespaces and pid containers and stuff.
Hmm. It must work fine despite that. Because I run self-compiled
kernels and there
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 17:53 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Raymond Jennings shent...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to point out that Google Chrome also makes use of CONFIG_ tests
to detect support for namespaces and pid containers and stuff.
Hmm. It must work
24 matches
Mail list logo
