On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:
> But I have one (final?) question. Since I am sometimes stuck to 80x25
> console...
> can we alphabetically sort the blacklist by the Vendor (the first
> field), instead of the quirk field(last field)? Or is there a
> technical/theoretical reason behind it?
I
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:
But I have one (final?) question. Since I am sometimes stuck to 80x25
console...
can we alphabetically sort the blacklist by the Vendor (the first
field), instead of the quirk field(last field)? Or is there a
technical/theoretical reason behind it?
I find
On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:
>
> > Ok, found it " hid_blacklist is alphabetically sorted blacklist by quirk
> > type. " But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g
> > shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (line 439, 440)
> > { USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE,
On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:
Ok, found it hid_blacklist is alphabetically sorted blacklist by quirk
type. But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g
shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (line 439, 440)
{ USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE,
4 matches
Mail list logo