If you lend (license) your lawnmower to BrucePerens, and receive nothing
in return, and BrucePerens hires someone else to draw a star on your
lawnmower, BrucePerens believes he can keep your lawnmower forever
because he "relied" on your lease and , even though he paid you nothing
and you never
What promise did you rely upon?
It is the right of the property owner to revoke.
You payed the property owner (Linux Programmer 721) nothing for his
code.
He never promised you that he would forgo his right to revoke
(Read the GPLv2, there is no mention of not revoking the license.
Something
Band together as a Bloc and take action together. (Bloc revocation).
One practice note: do not send a cease-and-desist before-hand.
Do not let your lawyer send a cease-and-desist before-hand.
If a potential defendant knows that their liberties regarding a
copyrighted work is in question
from
Thank you very much for this message, friend. We the people should
learn it and stop taking Cock of Conduct up our ass
пн, 31 дек. 2018 г. в 05:07, :
>
> Their take is that if you lent (licensed) them a lawnmower and told them
> not to wreck it, the fact that they did not wreck it entitles them
Their take is that if you lent (licensed) them a lawnmower and told them
not to wreck it, the fact that they did not wreck it entitles them to
keep the lawnmower forever(they followed your instruction regarding the
use of your property: "thus consideration, thus irrevocable license").
They
5 matches
Mail list logo
