On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:45:17AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> >> It allows a general interface to the kernel that does not require new
> >> syscalls/ioctls and can be accessed from user space without specifically
> >> compiled programs. You can use shell scripts, java, command line etc.
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:45:17AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
It allows a general interface to the kernel that does not require new
syscalls/ioctls and can be accessed from user space without specifically
compiled programs. You can use shell scripts, java, command line etc.
Yes,
At 2:59 PM +0200 2001-06-01, David Weinehall wrote:
> > Not to open a what may be can of worms but ...
>>
>> What's wrong with procfs?
>
>Imho, a procfs should be for process-information, nothing else.
>The procfs in its current form, while useful, is something horrible
>that should be taken
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:43:58AM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
> Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> >
> > We should start removing the crap from procfs in 2.5. Documenting shit is
> > a good step, but taking it out would be better.
> >
>
> Not to open a what may be can of worms but ...
>
Alexander Viro wrote:
...snip...
>
> We should start removing the crap from procfs in 2.5. Documenting shit is
> a good step, but taking it out would be better.
>
Not to open a what may be can of worms but ...
What's wrong with procfs?
It allows a general interface to the kernel that does
Alexander Viro wrote:
...snip...
We should start removing the crap from procfs in 2.5. Documenting shit is
a good step, but taking it out would be better.
Not to open a what may be can of worms but ...
What's wrong with procfs?
It allows a general interface to the kernel that does not
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 08:43:58AM -0400, Phil Auld wrote:
Alexander Viro wrote:
...snip...
We should start removing the crap from procfs in 2.5. Documenting shit is
a good step, but taking it out would be better.
Not to open a what may be can of worms but ...
What's wrong
At 2:59 PM +0200 2001-06-01, David Weinehall wrote:
Not to open a what may be can of worms but ...
What's wrong with procfs?
Imho, a procfs should be for process-information, nothing else.
The procfs in its current form, while useful, is something horrible
that should be taken out on the
On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 14:23:21 -0400,
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> José Luis Domingo López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of
> > "files" under /proc ?.
>
> Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it?
>
I'm
> Between SCSI and IEEE 1394;
> Fusion MPT device support ---> doesn't lead anywhere.
It does for me.. fusion requires scsi and experimental
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Linux Kernel v2.4.5-ac5 Configuration
> > CML1
> >
> > Bottom of IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices;
> >
> > < > Support Promise software RAID (NEW) -> Help
> > There is no help available for this kernel option.
>
> How about
> "Say "Y" or "M" if you
BH wrote:
>
> Great work, its nice to see none, or fewer No help availables in the kernel
> configuration.
> Some quick glances:
>
> Linux Kernel v2.4.5-ac5 Configuration
> CML1
>
> Bottom of IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices;
>
> < > Support Promise software RAID (NEW) -> Help
> There is no
Great work, its nice to see none, or fewer No help availables in the kernel
configuration.
Some quick glances:
Linux Kernel v2.4.5-ac5 Configuration
CML1
Bottom of IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices;
< > Support Promise software RAID (NEW) -> Help
There is no help available for this kernel
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> José Luis Domingo López wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 13:24:54 -0400,
> > Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >
> > > It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
> > > file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5.
José Luis Domingo López wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 13:24:54 -0400,
> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
> > file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one of the
> > 2699 configuration symbols actually
> José Luis Domingo López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of
> > "files" under /proc ?.
>
> Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it?
Some of it is documented
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
José Luis Domingo López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of
> "files" under /proc ?.
Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it?
--
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/;>Eric S. Raymond
[W]hat country can
On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 13:24:54 -0400,
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
> file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one of the
> 2699 configuration symbols actually used in the 2.4.5 codebase's C
> source files
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one of the
2699 configuration symbols actually used in the 2.4.5 codebase's C
source files or Makefiles now has an entry in Configure.help.
This does not, of course,
José Luis Domingo López wrote:
On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 13:24:54 -0400,
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one of the
2699 configuration symbols actually used in the
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
José Luis Domingo López wrote:
On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 13:24:54 -0400,
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one
Great work, its nice to see none, or fewer No help availables in the kernel
configuration.
Some quick glances:
Linux Kernel v2.4.5-ac5 Configuration
CML1
Bottom of IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices;
Support Promise software RAID (NEW) - Help
There is no help available for this kernel
BH wrote:
Great work, its nice to see none, or fewer No help availables in the kernel
configuration.
Some quick glances:
Linux Kernel v2.4.5-ac5 Configuration
CML1
Bottom of IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices;
Support Promise software RAID (NEW) - Help
There is no help available
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Linux Kernel v2.4.5-ac5 Configuration
CML1
Bottom of IDE, ATA and ATAPI Block devices;
Support Promise software RAID (NEW) - Help
There is no help available for this kernel option.
How about
Say Y or M if you have a Promise Fasttrak (tm)
On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 14:23:21 -0400,
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
José Luis Domingo López [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of
files under /proc ?.
Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it?
I'm not skilled
José Luis Domingo López [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of
files under /proc ?.
Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it?
--
a href=http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/;Eric S. Raymond/a
[W]hat country can
José Luis Domingo López [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Would it be great to have a similar documentation for those hundreds of
files under /proc ?.
Yes, this would be wonderful. Are you volunteering to write it?
Some of it is documented
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thursday, 31 May 2001, at 13:24:54 -0400,
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one of the
2699 configuration symbols actually used in the 2.4.5 codebase's C
source files or
Between SCSI and IEEE 1394;
Fusion MPT device support --- doesn't lead anywhere.
It does for me.. fusion requires scsi and experimental
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the Configure.help master
file is now complete with respect to 2.4.5. Every single one of the
2699 configuration symbols actually used in the 2.4.5 codebase's C
source files or Makefiles now has an entry in Configure.help.
This does not, of course,
30 matches
Mail list logo
