chunks of memory)
> >> mips (does support NUMA but also non-NUMA)
> >> parisc (both NUMA and non-NUMA)
> >>
> >> I'm not sure that these architecture maintainers even know that
> >> DISCONTIGMEM
> >> is deprecated. Adding linux-arch to the cc.
> >
&g
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 01:11:07AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 02:33:53PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:13:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > 32-bit NUMA systems
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So maybe it it time to mark SN2 broken and see if anyone screams?
>
> Without SN2 the whole machvec mess could basically go away - the
> only real difference between the remaining machvecs is which iommu
> if any we set up.
SPARSEMEM with VMEMMAP
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:58:09PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > ia64 has a such a huge number of memory model choices. Maybe we
> > need to cut it down to a small set that actually work.
>
> SGI systems had extremely discontiguous memory (they used some high
> order physical address bits in the
> ia64 has a such a huge number of memory model choices. Maybe we
> need to cut it down to a small set that actually work.
SGI systems had extremely discontiguous memory (they used some high
order physical address bits in the tens/hundreds of terabyte range for the
node number ... so there would
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:49:57PM +0300, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > ia64 (looks complicated ...)
> >
> > Well as far as I can tell it was not even used 12 or so years ago on
> > Itanium when I worked on that stuff.
>
> My notes tell that on UP ia64 (RX2620), !NUMA was broken with both
> SPARSEMEM
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 02:33:53PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:13:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > 32-bit NUMA systems should be non-existent in practice. The last NUMA
> > > system I'm aware of
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 02:33:53PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:13:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > 32-bit NUMA systems should be non-existent in practice. The last NUMA
> > > system I'm aware of
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:13:54AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > 32-bit NUMA systems should be non-existent in practice. The last NUMA
> > system I'm aware of that was both NUMA and 32-bit only died somewhere
> > between 2004 and
ia64 (looks complicated ...)
Well as far as I can tell it was not even used 12 or so years ago on
Itanium when I worked on that stuff.
My notes tell that on UP ia64 (RX2620), !NUMA was broken with both
SPARSEMEM and DISCONTIGMEM. NUMA+SPARSEMEM or !NUMA worked. Even
NUMA+DISCONTIGMEM worked,
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 10:16:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 32-bit NUMA systems should be non-existent in practice. The last NUMA
> system I'm aware of that was both NUMA and 32-bit only died somewhere
> between 2004 and 2007. If someone is running a 64-bit capable system in
> 32-bit mode with
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> ia64 (looks complicated ...)
Well as far as I can tell it was not even used 12 or so years ago on
Itanium when I worked on that stuff.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 06:26:07AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 09:38:59AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 07:05:21AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > DISCONTIG is essentially
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 09:38:59AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 07:05:21AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > DISCONTIG is essentially deprecated and even parisc plans to move to
> > > SPARSEMEM so there is no
GB of memory)
> ia64 (looks complicated ...)
> m68k (for multiple chunks of memory)
> mips (does support NUMA but also non-NUMA)
> parisc (both NUMA and non-NUMA)
i386 NUMA as well
> I'm not sure that these architecture maintainers even know that DISCONTIGMEM
> is deprecated. Adding linux-arch to the cc.
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
A)
parisc (both NUMA and non-NUMA)
I'm not sure that these architecture maintainers even know that DISCONTIGMEM
is deprecated. Adding linux-arch to the cc.
t also non-NUMA DISCONTIGMEM)
>> arc (for supporting more than 1GB of memory)
>> ia64 (looks complicated ...)
>> m68k (for multiple chunks of memory)
>> mips (does support NUMA but also non-NUMA)
>> parisc (both NUMA and non-NUMA)
>>
>> I'm not sure th
GB of memory)
> ia64 (looks complicated ...)
> m68k (for multiple chunks of memory)
> mips (does support NUMA but also non-NUMA)
> parisc (both NUMA and non-NUMA)
>
> I'm not sure that these architecture maintainers even know that DISCONTIGMEM
> is deprecated. Adding linux-arch to t
18 matches
Mail list logo
