Re: Documentation/trace/events.rst: wrong numbering of sections

2020-05-17 Thread Li Xinhai
>Hi, > >On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 09:11 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> It's best to Cc the maintainers of the file. Nobody reads linux- >> kernel (it >> produces 800 emails a day!). Luckily, I happen to monitor the >> linux-trace-devel list (which is mostly for userland tools), >> otherwise this >> em

Re: Documentation/trace/events.rst: wrong numbering of sections

2020-05-15 Thread Tom Zanussi
Hi, On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 09:11 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > It's best to Cc the maintainers of the file. Nobody reads linux- > kernel (it > produces 800 emails a day!). Luckily, I happen to monitor the > linux-trace-devel list (which is mostly for userland tools), > otherwise this > email would

Re: Documentation/trace/events.rst: wrong numbering of sections

2020-05-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
It's best to Cc the maintainers of the file. Nobody reads linux-kernel (it produces 800 emails a day!). Luckily, I happen to monitor the linux-trace-devel list (which is mostly for userland tools), otherwise this email would have been lost to the LKML abyss. On Fri, 15 May 2020 15:43:43 +0800 "L

Documentation/trace/events.rst: wrong numbering of sections

2020-05-15 Thread Li Xinhai
This document has below numbering of its sections: 1. Introduction 2. Using Event Tracing 2.1 Via the 'set_event' interface 2.2 Via the 'enable' toggle 2.3 Boot option 3. Defining an event-enabled tracepoint 4. Event formats 5. Event filtering 5.1 Expression syntax 5.2 Setting filters 5.3 Clearing