On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:55:58PM +0100, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote:
> I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this
> morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to
> ~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the
> inclusion of reiserfs
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
=?us-ascii?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Don't get me wrong, I am personally really excited that reiserfs was
>included. I just thought that you basically wanted 2.4.1 to be "boring".
Reiserfs inclusion in 2.4.1 was basically the plan for
Hi Linus
I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this
morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to
~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the
inclusion of reiserfs was the reason for this. While I am certainly
happy for the
Hi Linus
I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this
morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to
~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the
inclusion of reiserfs was the reason for this. While I am certainly
happy for the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
=?us-ascii?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I am personally really excited that reiserfs was
included. I just thought that you basically wanted 2.4.1 to be "boring".
Reiserfs inclusion in 2.4.1 was basically the plan for the very
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:55:58PM +0100, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote:
I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this
morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to
~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the
inclusion of reiserfs was
6 matches
Mail list logo
