Re: EXT: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] dma: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients

2016-07-02 Thread Vinod Koul
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:59:30PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote: > > > On 28/06/16 17:34, Vinod Koul wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:16:30PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote: > >>Having the SDMA driver use a tasklet for running the clients > >>callback introduce some issues: > >> - probability to have

Re: EXT: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] dma: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients

2016-07-02 Thread Vinod Koul
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 05:59:30PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote: > > > On 28/06/16 17:34, Vinod Koul wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:16:30PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote: > >>Having the SDMA driver use a tasklet for running the clients > >>callback introduce some issues: > >> - probability to have

Re: EXT: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] dma: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients

2016-07-01 Thread Nandor Han
On 28/06/16 17:34, Vinod Koul wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:16:30PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote: Having the SDMA driver use a tasklet for running the clients callback introduce some issues: - probability to have desynchronized data because of the race condition created since the DMA

Re: EXT: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] dma: imx-sdma - reduce transfer latency for DMA cyclic clients

2016-07-01 Thread Nandor Han
On 28/06/16 17:34, Vinod Koul wrote: On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:16:30PM +0300, Nandor Han wrote: Having the SDMA driver use a tasklet for running the clients callback introduce some issues: - probability to have desynchronized data because of the race condition created since the DMA