> Hmm... How should we respond to that sort of thing? In principle the
> NFS layer supposes that if we have a hard mount, then unreachable
> ports etc are a temporary problem, and we should wait them out. (In
> fact, I've made an RPC 'ping' routine that improves on that behaviour
> but which unfo
> " " == Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > This is caused by 2.3/2.4 changes in the network code error
>> > reporting of unreachables with UDP I suspect. It looks like
>> > the NFS code hasn't yet caught up with the error notification
>> > stuff
>>
>> No. It wa
> I called the mount command five minutes before the final message above.
> I tried NFS with and without NFSv3 code, with no change at all.
This is caused by 2.3/2.4 changes in the network code error reporting of
unreachables with UDP I suspect. It looks like the NFS code hasn't yet caught
up wit
Christian Ullrich writes:
> About three weeks ago, I complained loudly about very slow NFS mounts
> involving a 2.2.17 server and a 2.2.18 client.
>
> Today, I complain loudly about *extremely* slow NFS mounts
> with the very same server and the same client now running 2.4.0.
In all cases, you n
* Christian Ullrich wrote on Saturday, 2000-01-06:
> Using 2.2.18, every [NFS] mount took about 15 seconds, now, using 2.4.0,
> every mount takes exactly five minutes, which is way too long.
Ok, it's fixed now. Thanks to all of you, and especially the
(right now) three people who gave me the hel
Hrm. I'm not seeing this problem on my setups.
Did you send details about your configurationlast time .. Could you
resend?
Christian Ullrich wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> About three weeks ago, I complained loudly about very slow NFS mounts
> involving a 2.2.17 server and a 2.2.18 client.
>
> Today,
Hello!
About three weeks ago, I complained loudly about very slow NFS mounts
involving a 2.2.17 server and a 2.2.18 client.
Today, I complain loudly about *extremely* slow NFS mounts
with the very same server and the same client now running 2.4.0.
Using 2.2.18, every mount took about 15 seconds
7 matches
Mail list logo