Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-25 Thread Juri Haberland
In article <0106250203070J.00430@starship> you wrote: > On Monday 25 June 2001 01:49, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> Daniel Phillips writes: >> > On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> >> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm >> >> as seen in Tux2.

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-25 Thread Juri Haberland
In article 0106250203070J.00430@starship you wrote: On Monday 25 June 2001 01:49, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: Daniel Phillips writes: On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm as seen in Tux2. This means it

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Monday 25 June 2001 01:49, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Daniel Phillips writes: > > On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > >> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm > >> as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. > >> Yep, it whips

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Daniel Phillips writes: > On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm >> as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. >> Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what >> we have in

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm > as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. > Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what > we have in the superblock (boot sector): >

FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what we have in the superblock (boot sector): __u32 fat32_length; /* sectors/FAT */ __u16 flags;

FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what we have in the superblock (boot sector): __u32 fat32_length; /* sectors/FAT */ __u16 flags;

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what we have in the superblock (boot sector):

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Daniel Phillips writes: On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what we have in the

Re: FAT32 superiority over ext2 :-)

2001-06-24 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Monday 25 June 2001 01:49, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: Daniel Phillips writes: On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity. Yep, it whips your typical