Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-26 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:59:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > It may work, but the bridge secondary/subordinate numbers look wrong. > No, these numbers look correct for me. Read comment in drivers/pci/pci.c: if (!is_cardbus) { /* Now we can scan all subordinate buses...

Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-26 Thread Martin Mares
Hi Jeff! > First, some definitions: > downstream - away from the host processor > primary - number of the PCI bus closer to the host processor > secondary - number of the PCI bus on the downstream side of the PCI > bridge > subordinate - number of the highest-numbered bus on the downstream side

Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-26 Thread Martin Mares
Hi Jeff! First, some definitions: downstream - away from the host processor primary - number of the PCI bus closer to the host processor secondary - number of the PCI bus on the downstream side of the PCI bridge subordinate - number of the highest-numbered bus on the downstream side of

Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-26 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:59:39PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: It may work, but the bridge secondary/subordinate numbers look wrong. No, these numbers look correct for me. Read comment in drivers/pci/pci.c: if (!is_cardbus) { /* Now we can scan all subordinate buses... */

Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
It may work, but the bridge secondary/subordinate numbers look wrong. I am pondering if the bus numbering/bridging stuff shouldn't be given a good looking-over. I have the wonderful _PCI System Architecture, 4th Ed._ in my hands, and it describes PCI-PCI bridge init in great detail, including

FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-25 Thread jamal
The problem is resolved. Mucho Gracias from me and a few (probably hundreds of people in my workplace) who might want to boot 2.3/4 on these Dell docking stations (actually we own a few thousand of them, i am just trying to make sure Linux runs fine ;->) The proper fix, which is i think what

FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-25 Thread jamal
The problem is resolved. Mucho Gracias from me and a few (probably hundreds of people in my workplace) who might want to boot 2.3/4 on these Dell docking stations (actually we own a few thousand of them, i am just trying to make sure Linux runs fine ;-) The proper fix, which is i think what

Re: FIXED! Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
It may work, but the bridge secondary/subordinate numbers look wrong. I am pondering if the bus numbering/bridging stuff shouldn't be given a good looking-over. I have the wonderful _PCI System Architecture, 4th Ed._ in my hands, and it describes PCI-PCI bridge init in great detail, including