Re: For review: open_by_name_at(2) man page [v2]

2014-03-19 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Mike, On 03/19/2014 07:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue 18 Mar 2014 13:55:15 Michael Kerrisk wrote: >> The >> .I flags >> argument is a bit mask constructed by ORing together >> zero or more of the following value: >> .TP >> .B AT_EMPTY_PATH >> Allow >> .I pathname >> to be an empty string

Re: For review: open_by_name_at(2) man page [v2]

2014-03-19 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[CC =+ Al Viro] Hi Neil, On 03/19/2014 05:13 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:55:15 +0100 "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" > wrote: > >> Hi Aneesh, (and others) >> >> After integrating review comments from NeilBown and Christoph Hellwig, >> here is draft 2 of a man page I've written f

Re: For review: open_by_name_at(2) man page [v2]

2014-03-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue 18 Mar 2014 13:55:15 Michael Kerrisk wrote: > The > .I flags > argument is a bit mask constructed by ORing together > zero or more of the following value: > .TP > .B AT_EMPTY_PATH > Allow > .I pathname > to be an empty string. > See above. > (which may have been obtained using the > .BR open

Re: For review: open_by_name_at(2) man page [v2]

2014-03-18 Thread NeilBrown
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:55:15 +0100 "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" wrote: > Hi Aneesh, (and others) > > After integrating review comments from NeilBown and Christoph Hellwig, > here is draft 2 of a man page I've written for name_to_handle_at(2) and > open_by_name_at(2). Especially thanks to Neil's

For review: open_by_name_at(2) man page [v2]

2014-03-18 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Hi Aneesh, (and others) After integrating review comments from NeilBown and Christoph Hellwig, here is draft 2 of a man page I've written for name_to_handle_at(2) and open_by_name_at(2). Especially thanks to Neil's comments, several parts of the page underwent a substantial rewrite. Would you be w