This may not be helpful (and the thread is now two days
old), but I just wanted to add that after using Mr.
Torvalds' comment-out-irq13 suggestion and Vojtech
Pavlik's "Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug"
patch (Oct 26), both with 2.4.0-t10, I've successfully
had a 2.4 series uptime >48
This may not be helpful (and the thread is now two days
old), but I just wanted to add that after using Mr.
Torvalds' comment-out-irq13 suggestion and Vojtech
Pavlik's "Possible critical VIA vt82c686a chip bug"
patch (Oct 26), both with 2.4.0-t10, I've successfully
had a 2.4 series uptime 48
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> --- Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
[...]
> > Markus, can you make the irq13 test the first thing
> > - don't worry about
> > 3dnow as that seems to not be a deciding factor..
> Ok, that was it! It's IRQ 13. Guess I
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> I will also try to compile a non AMD specific kernel
> and see if that makes a difference. If just this 40GB
> drive would fsck faster :)
mount -o remount,ro [...]
--
Horst von Brand [EMAIL
--- Brian Gerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, that was it! It's IRQ 13. Guess I should
have
> > tried that first. Now everything works perfectly.
> > Thanks everybody.
>
> What motherboard do you have? I can't reproduce
> this on my FIC SD11.
>
> --
>
>
Markus Schoder wrote:
>
> --- Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
>
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, adrian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > > There's almost certainly more than that. I'd
> > love to have a report on my
> > > > asm-only
Markus Schoder wrote:
--- Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, adrian wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
There's almost certainly more than that. I'd
love to have a report on my
asm-only version, but even so I suspect it
--- Brian Gerst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that was it! It's IRQ 13. Guess I should
have
tried that first. Now everything works perfectly.
Thanks everybody.
What motherboard do you have? I can't reproduce
this on my FIC SD11.
--
Brian Gerst
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--- Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
[...]
Markus, can you make the irq13 test the first thing
- don't worry about
3dnow as that seems to not be a deciding factor..
Ok, that was it! It's IRQ 13. Guess I should have
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
I will also try to compile a non AMD specific kernel
and see if that makes a difference. If just this 40GB
drive would fsck faster :)
mount -o remount,ro [...]
--
Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
adrian wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
> > asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
>
> I tried all three versions, and no freezes. I forgot to mention the
--- Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, adrian wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > There's almost certainly more than that. I'd
> love to have a report on my
> > > asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also
>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, adrian wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
> > asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
>
> I tried all three versions, and no freezes.
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Markus Schoder wrote:
>
> Your test program is indeed sufficient to trigger the
> freeze. Unfortunately the patch does not make a
> difference :(
Ok.
This may in fact be an Athlon CPU bug. But before we contact anybody from
AMD, I'd really need to know what the result
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
> asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
I tried all three versions, and no freezes. I forgot to mention the tests
were run on a model 2
Markus Schoder wrote:
> My test program caused the exception (and the freeze)
> unintendedly in the return statement since the
> division was optimized away as Brian pointed out.
It's quite strange that I cannot seem to trigger the
problem here on my machine.
> I know of another guy with the
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Compiler specific ?
>
> There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
> asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
> because I'm not able to trigger anything like this on any machines I have
> access to (none of
--- Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> If I'm right, the proper test-program should be
> something like
>
Your test program is indeed sufficient to trigger the
freeze. Unfortunately the patch does not make a
difference :(
My test program caused the exception (and the freeze)
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > I sure as hell hope this isn't an Athlon issue. Can other people try
> > > the test-program and see if we have a pattern (ie "it happens only on
> > > Athlons", or "Linus is on drugs and it happens for everybody
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I sure as hell hope this isn't an Athlon issue. Can other people try
> > the test-program and see if we have a pattern (ie "it happens only on
> > Athlons", or "Linus is on drugs and it happens for everybody else").
>
> I've tried both variants (fesetenv and
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> I get Floating Point Exception (core dumped), but I needed to use the
> modified program below to keep GCC from optimizing the division away as
> a constant. This is on test11-pre5.
I'm starting to suspect that it's really a combination of three
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> =?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The following small program (linked against glibc 2.1.3) reliably
> >freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at least kernels
> >2.4.0-test10 and
Hi,
I am using test10-pre5 on Duron.
>
> I couldn't get it to freeze. I tried it with asm("fldcw %0": :"m" (0))
> and with fesetenv() using gcc -lm to link it. I have glibc-2.1.2,
> egcs 2.91.66, and 2.4.0-test10.
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
Same here except gcc-2.95.2 and glibc 2.13. I got an
Hi,
I am using test10-pre5 on Duron.
I couldn't get it to freeze. I tried it with asm("fldcw %0": :"m" (0))
and with fesetenv() using gcc -lm to link it. I have glibc-2.1.2,
egcs 2.91.66, and 2.4.0-test10.
Regards,
Adrian
Same here except gcc-2.95.2 and glibc 2.13. I got an floating
Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following small program (linked against glibc 2.1.3) reliably
freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at least kernels
2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Brian Gerst wrote:
I get Floating Point Exception (core dumped), but I needed to use the
modified program below to keep GCC from optimizing the division away as
a constant. This is on test11-pre5.
I'm starting to suspect that it's really a combination of three
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I sure as hell hope this isn't an Athlon issue. Can other people try
the test-program and see if we have a pattern (ie "it happens only on
Athlons", or "Linus is on drugs and it happens for everybody else").
I've tried both variants (fesetenv and inline-asm)
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I sure as hell hope this isn't an Athlon issue. Can other people try
the test-program and see if we have a pattern (ie "it happens only on
Athlons", or "Linus is on drugs and it happens for everybody else").
I've
--- Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm right, the proper test-program should be
something like
Your test program is indeed sufficient to trigger the
freeze. Unfortunately the patch does not make a
difference :(
My test program caused the exception (and the freeze)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Compiler specific ?
There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
because I'm not able to trigger anything like this on any machines I have
access to (none of them
Markus Schoder wrote:
My test program caused the exception (and the freeze)
unintendedly in the return statement since the
division was optimized away as Brian pointed out.
It's quite strange that I cannot seem to trigger the
problem here on my machine.
I know of another guy with the exact
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
I tried all three versions, and no freezes. I forgot to mention the tests
were run on a model 2
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Markus Schoder wrote:
Your test program is indeed sufficient to trigger the
freeze. Unfortunately the patch does not make a
difference :(
Ok.
This may in fact be an Athlon CPU bug. But before we contact anybody from
AMD, I'd really need to know what the result from
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, adrian wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
I tried all three versions, and no freezes. I forgot
--- Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, adrian wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
There's almost certainly more than that. I'd
love to have a report on my
asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also
requires the 3dnow stuff,
adrian wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
There's almost certainly more than that. I'd love to have a report on my
asm-only version, but even so I suspect it also requires the 3dnow stuff,
I tried all three versions, and no freezes. I forgot to mention the tests
were
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I sure as hell hope this isn't an Athlon issue. Can other people try
> the test-program and see if we have a pattern (ie "it happens only on
> Athlons", or "Linus is on drugs and it happens for everybody else").
I've tried both variants (fesetenv and inline-asm) with
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The following small program (linked against glibc 2.1.3) reliably
>freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at least kernels
>2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the SysRq keys do not work
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The following small program (linked against glibc 2.1.3) reliably
>freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at least kernels
>2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the SysRq keys do not work
The following small program (linked against glibc
2.1.3) reliably
freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at
least kernels
2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the SysRq
keys do not work
after the freeze.
Older kernels (e.g. 2.3.40) seem to work. Any Ideas?
The following small program (linked against glibc
2.1.3) reliably
freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at
least kernels
2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the SysRq
keys do not work
after the freeze.
Older kernels (e.g. 2.3.40) seem to work. Any Ideas?
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following small program (linked against glibc 2.1.3) reliably
freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at least kernels
2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the SysRq keys do not work
after
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
=?iso-8859-1?q?Markus=20Schoder?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following small program (linked against glibc 2.1.3) reliably
freezes my system (Athlon Thunderbird CPU) with at least kernels
2.4.0-test10 and 2.4.0-test11-pre5. Even the SysRq keys do not work
after
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I sure as hell hope this isn't an Athlon issue. Can other people try
the test-program and see if we have a pattern (ie "it happens only on
Athlons", or "Linus is on drugs and it happens for everybody else").
I've tried both variants (fesetenv and inline-asm) with
44 matches
Mail list logo
