Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 17:16, Chad Miller wrote: (added [EMAIL PROTECTED], as he may be interested in one range behind bridge overlapping both forwarding ranges...) > #00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8371 [KX133 AGP] (prog-if \ > #00 [Normal decode]) > # Flags: bus master, 66Mhz,

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:40:51PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > [X] Output under 2.2.x is correct: '/25' for 32MB range. I have no idea > why X complains about region D600-D7FF - can you look at > '... regions behind bridge' when you boot 2.2.x (they are on 0:01.0 > device, AFAIK) ?

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb o

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 15:55, Chad Miller wrote: > (CC'd to lkml) > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should > > be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). > > Ooo! Here's an

G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...)

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
(CC'd to lkml) On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should > be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). Ooo! Here's an edited diff of 'lspci -v' under 2.2.18 versus 2.4.0:

G400 behavior different, 2.2.18-2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...)

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
(CC'd to lkml) On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). Ooo! Here's an edited diff of 'lspci -v' under 2.2.18 versus 2.4.0:

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18-2.4.0 (was: matroxfb o

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 15:55, Chad Miller wrote: (CC'd to lkml) On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). Ooo! Here's an edited diff

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18-2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:40:51PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: [X] Output under 2.2.x is correct: '/25' for 32MB range. I have no idea why X complains about region D600-D7FF - can you look at '... regions behind bridge' when you boot 2.2.x (they are on 0:01.0 device, AFAIK) ? Under

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18-2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 17:16, Chad Miller wrote: (added [EMAIL PROTECTED], as he may be interested in one range behind bridge overlapping both forwarding ranges...) #00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8371 [KX133 AGP] (prog-if \ #00 [Normal decode]) # Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium