On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:04:46 -0700, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
>>
>> > I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing
>> > the
>> > delay seems to fix
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
>
> > I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing
> > the
> > delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
> > disk in such an
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:53, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> This one certainly goes into the Bizarro file.
>
> Just out of curiosity -- when you use the powered hub, does the drive work
> even if you remove that delay completely?
I haven't tested that. I will, next time I need the drive, which will
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:53, Alan Stern wrote:
This one certainly goes into the Bizarro file.
Just out of curiosity -- when you use the powered hub, does the drive work
even if you remove that delay completely?
I haven't tested that. I will, next time I need the drive, which will
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing
the
delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
disk in such an enclosure, the
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:04:46 -0700, Matthew Dharm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing
the
delay seems to fix it, albeit
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> Hello lists,
>
> (a mail for the archives)
>
> I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing the
> delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
> disk in such an enclosure, the higher the
Hello lists,
(a mail for the archives)
I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing the
delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
disk in such an enclosure, the higher the udelay() had to be - atleast that's
what I'm seeing here
Hello lists,
(a mail for the archives)
I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing the
delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
disk in such an enclosure, the higher the udelay() had to be - atleast that's
what I'm seeing here
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
Hello lists,
(a mail for the archives)
I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing the
delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the
disk in such an enclosure, the higher the udelay() had
10 matches
Mail list logo
