"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:05:24 -0500
>From: Tom Leete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Your net/ipv4/tcp.c patch from the NE2000 thread cured them even
>before I found the hardware fault. Has that patch gone to the
>queue? I recommend it.
>
> The bugs I
"David S. Miller" wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:05:24 -0500
From: Tom Leete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your net/ipv4/tcp.c patch from the NE2000 thread cured them even
before I found the hardware fault. Has that patch gone to the
queue? I recommend it.
The bugs I was "fixing"
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:05:24 -0500
From: Tom Leete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Your net/ipv4/tcp.c patch from the NE2000 thread cured them even
before I found the hardware fault. Has that patch gone to the
queue? I recommend it.
The bugs I was "fixing" there were due to problems in
Hi,
My lockup problems started increasing in frequency, and it
became obvious that they were independent of the kernel I
booted. The shoe dropped, nic was failing. It's salvage now.
The bizarre shift errors on ftp are gone, so the data I sent
is irrelevant to the kernel.
The soft hangs I was
Hi,
My lockup problems started increasing in frequency, and it
became obvious that they were independent of the kernel I
booted. The shoe dropped, nic was failing. It's salvage now.
The bizarre shift errors on ftp are gone, so the data I sent
is irrelevant to the kernel.
The soft hangs I was
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:05:24 -0500
From: Tom Leete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your net/ipv4/tcp.c patch from the NE2000 thread cured them even
before I found the hardware fault. Has that patch gone to the
queue? I recommend it.
The bugs I was "fixing" there were due to problems in wait
6 matches
Mail list logo
