On Sunday 2013-01-20 14:54, Tom St Denis wrote:
>>
>> > You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's
>> > already in the kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
>> >
>> > How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use
>> > the Kernel source itself as
On Sunday 2013-01-20 14:54, Tom St Denis wrote:
You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's
already in the kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use
the Kernel source itself as a reference?
On 01/21/2013 09:31 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Rostedt" To: "Tom St
Denis" Cc: "David
Dillow", "Borislav Petkov",
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Monday,
21 January, 2013 10:28:33 AM Su
- Original Message -
> From: "Chris Friesen"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: "Steven Rostedt" , "David Dillow"
> , "Borislav Petkov" ,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Rostedt"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: "David Dillow" , "Borislav Petkov" ,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 10:28:33 AM
> Subject:
t; > net...@vger.kernel.org
> > Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 9:37:41 AM
> > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
> > >
> > > I find that 73% of all stats are made up.
> >
> > I was only talking about my own experience. I gave no numbers.
>
> That was
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Rostedt"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: "David Dillow" , "Borislav Petkov" ,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 9:37:41 AM
> Subject: Re
t; > net...@vger.kernel.org
> > Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 8:38:54 AM
> > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> > > The missing semi-colon is in fact missing and for that I apologize.
> > > This btw is the first legitimate gripe with the code thus far.
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Rostedt"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: "David Dillow" , "Borislav Petkov" ,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 8:38:54 AM
> S
teven Rostedt"
> >
> > Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 4:18:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
> >
> > On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > > The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
> >
> > It was
- Original Message -
> From: "David Dillow"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: "Borislav Petkov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org, "Steven Rostedt"
>
> Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 4:18:01 AM
> Subjec
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
It was more than just the ()'s. You completely botched the indentation
in the parts of code you didn't copy from xcbc.c, among other issues.
> For me to re-write complete statements
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
It was more than just the ()'s. You completely botched the indentation
in the parts of code you didn't copy from xcbc.c, among other issues.
For me to re-write complete statements for
: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
It was more than just the ()'s. You completely botched the
indentation
in the parts of code you didn't copy from xcbc.c, among other issues.
Leaving
...@goodmis.org
Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 4:18:01 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
The problem is for me to add the ()'s is a no brainer.
It was more than just the ()'s. You completely botched the
indentation
in the parts
: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
The missing semi-colon is in fact missing and for that I apologize.
This btw is the first legitimate gripe with the code thus far.
I've also found that those that have poor coding styles also have
more
of these legitimate problems too. Which is another reason
...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 8:38:54 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
The missing semi-colon is in fact missing and for that I apologize.
This btw is the first legitimate gripe with the code thus far.
I've also found that those that have poor coding styles also have
: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
I find that 73% of all stats are made up.
I was only talking about my own experience. I gave no numbers.
That was a joke. You assumed that because I don't trim whitespace from
multi-line comments [among other asinine code style issues] that I'm a bad
developer
...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 9:37:41 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
I find that 73% of all stats are made up.
I was only talking about my own experience. I gave no numbers.
That was a joke. You assumed that because I don't trim whitespace from
multi-line
: IPsec AH use of ahash
When I send a patch to another maintainer, and they tell me to fix
the
way I did the comments, I don't complain. I fix the comments and
resend.
Which is less of a problem when there is a timeliness factor. In the business
world people move on and don't work
, 21 January, 2013 10:49:19 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On 01/21/2013 09:31 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steven Rostedtrost...@goodmis.org To: Tom St
Deniststde...@elliptictech.com Cc: David
Dillowd...@thedillows.org, Borislav Petkovb...@alien8.de
January, 2013 10:28:33 AM Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
When I send a patch to another maintainer, and they tell me to fix
the way I did the comments, I don't complain. I fix the comments
and resend.
Which is less of a problem when there is a timeliness factor. In the
business world people
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:40:49PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> If you guys can't appreciate that I should just bow out of the
> discussion. I didn't come here looking for a fight I came here to seek
> reason.
Ok, I'm going to pretty much repeat what Steve said but I'm going to
repeat it only
...@gondor.apana.org.au,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
> "Michal Kubecek" , "Mike Galbraith"
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 5:07:22 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:56:27AM -0500, Tom St Den
- Original Message -
> From: "Alan Cox"
> To: "Tom St Denis" , "David Dillow"
>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 3:30:49 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> Look
- Original Message -
> From: "Borislav Petkov"
> To: "Steven Rostedt"
> Cc: "Tom St Denis" , "David Dillow"
> , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 7:34:41 PM
> Subject:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> My God, you sound like a 2 year old.
>
> Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried about,
> as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it
> would have taken you to clean up your work.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 01:47:01PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
>
>
> >
> > You mean the content at http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/11/369 ?
> >
> > Funny how posting to an mailing list works...
>
> I posted that in December ... it wasn't till January that I got the first
> reply back about it
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:56:27AM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
>
> You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's already in the
> kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
>
> How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use the Kernel
> source itself as
Look at it from the kernel end. What happens if your change shows up bugs on
another architecture or has a flaw. It works for you now but you plan to dump
and run. That's not a viable long term development model for upstream.
The licence allows you to do it, and other parties who care more to
- Original Message -
> From: "David Dillow"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 1:11:11 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 12:40 -0500,
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 12:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 10:07 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > > In all likelihood I will submit a revised CMAC patch but it'll take
> > > time before I can get business hours to work on it. So instead of
> > > having a maintainer just touch
- Original Message -
> From: "David Dillow"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 11:34:52 AM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 10:07 -0500,
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 10:07 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> In all likelihood I will submit a revised CMAC patch but it'll take
> time before I can get business hours to work on it. So instead of
> having a maintainer just touch it up we're all going to lose out
> because of pride?
Yes -- but it
r.hengli.com.au,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
> "Michal Kubecek"
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 12:03:34 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On 01/20/2013 07:07 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
> >
> > In all likelihood
On 01/20/2013 07:07 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
In all likelihood I will submit a revised CMAC patch but it'll take
time before I can get business hours to work on it. So instead of
having a maintainer just touch it up we're all going to lose out
because of pride?
It's not about pride. It is
@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, "Michal Kubecek"
>
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 9:11:34 AM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 07:55 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > &
t;
> > , "steffen klassert" ,
> > herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, "Michal Kubecek"
> >
> > Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 12:06:21 AM
> > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
> >
&g
...@gondor.apana.org.au,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
> "Michal Kubecek" , "Mike Galbraith"
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 8:34:20 AM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> Am 20.01.2013 13:56, schrieb Tom St Denis:
&
Am 20.01.2013 13:56, schrieb Tom St Denis:
You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's already in the
kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use the Kernel
source itself as a reference?
In case of the
...@gondor.apana.org.au,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
> "Michal Kubecek"
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 5:31:32 AM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:06:21AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Sounds as though
rnel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, "Michal Kubecek"
>
> Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 12:06:21 AM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
>
> > For those of us who do Kernel development during
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:06:21AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Sounds as though any patches you submit land on your dinner plate just
> like potatoes. Hand the cook a pot of half peeled potatoes, he/she may
> say try again.
And how he/she would say it! I've seen serious fights spring up from
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:06:21AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Sounds as though any patches you submit land on your dinner plate just
like potatoes. Hand the cook a pot of half peeled potatoes, he/she may
say try again.
And how he/she would say it! I've seen serious fights spring up from
,
herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek
mkube...@suse.cz
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 12:06:21 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
For those of us who do Kernel
klassert
steffen.klass...@secunet.com, herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Kubecek mkube...@suse.cz
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 5:31:32 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:06:21AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote
Am 20.01.2013 13:56, schrieb Tom St Denis:
You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's already in the
kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use the Kernel
source itself as a reference?
In case of the
klassert
steffen.klass...@secunet.com, herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Kubecek mkube...@suse.cz, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 8:34:20 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
Am 20.01.2013 13:56, schrieb
...@davemloft.net, steffen klassert steffen.klass...@secunet.com,
herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek
mkube...@suse.cz
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 12:06:21 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30
,
herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek
mkube...@suse.cz
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 9:11:34 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 07:55 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mike
On 01/20/2013 07:07 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
In all likelihood I will submit a revised CMAC patch but it'll take
time before I can get business hours to work on it. So instead of
having a maintainer just touch it up we're all going to lose out
because of pride?
It's not about pride. It is
steffen.klass...@secunet.com, herb...@gondor.hengli.com.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Kubecek mkube...@suse.cz
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 12:03:34 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On 01/20/2013 07:07 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
In all likelihood I
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 10:07 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
In all likelihood I will submit a revised CMAC patch but it'll take
time before I can get business hours to work on it. So instead of
having a maintainer just touch it up we're all going to lose out
because of pride?
Yes -- but it would
- Original Message -
From: David Dillow d...@thedillows.org
To: Tom St Denis tstde...@elliptictech.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 11:34:52 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 10:07 -0500, Tom St
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 12:40 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 10:07 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
In all likelihood I will submit a revised CMAC patch but it'll take
time before I can get business hours to work on it. So instead of
having a maintainer just touch it up we're
- Original Message -
From: David Dillow d...@thedillows.org
To: Tom St Denis tstde...@elliptictech.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 1:11:11 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 12:40 -0500, Tom St
Look at it from the kernel end. What happens if your change shows up bugs on
another architecture or has a flaw. It works for you now but you plan to dump
and run. That's not a viable long term development model for upstream.
The licence allows you to do it, and other parties who care more to
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:56:27AM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
You should really try running checkpatch.pl over code that's already in the
kernel before you call out new contributors on it.
How is this supposed to not be adversarial when I can't even use the Kernel
source itself as a
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 01:47:01PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
You mean the content at http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/11/369 ?
Funny how posting to an mailing list works...
I posted that in December ... it wasn't till January that I got the first
reply back about it failing to meet
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
My God, you sound like a 2 year old.
Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried about,
as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it
would have taken you to clean up your work.
It's
: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:54:07PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
My God, you sound like a 2 year old.
Suck it up, and do the fixes. It's not the time you are worried
about,
as you most definitely spent more time bitching to everyone than it
would have taken
- Original Message -
From: Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
To: Tom St Denis tstde...@elliptictech.com, David Dillow
d...@thedillows.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 3:30:49 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
Look
klassert
steffen.klass...@secunet.com, herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Kubecek mkube...@suse.cz, Mike Galbraith bitbuc...@online.de
Sent: Sunday, 20 January, 2013 5:07:22 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:56
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 07:40:49PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
If you guys can't appreciate that I should just bow out of the
discussion. I didn't come here looking for a fight I came here to seek
reason.
Ok, I'm going to pretty much repeat what Steve said but I'm going to
repeat it only once
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> For those of us who do Kernel development during business hours it's
> hard to justify the work when the path to mainline is convoluted and
> landmined.
Sounds as though any patches you submit land on your dinner plate just
like potatoes.
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> As someone who maintained (and I mean that in all senses not just
> applied patches) OSS projects while working full time and still trying
> to have a life I get it. That said I never turned away patches solely
> on "style" issues. At the
el@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 10:59:55 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 03:33 +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> > Someone already pointed you to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
> > Please do
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
For those of us who do Kernel development during business hours it's
hard to justify the work when the path to mainline is convoluted and
landmined.
Sounds as though any patches you submit land on your dinner plate just
like potatoes.
, herb...@gondor.apana.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, net...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 10:59:55 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 03:33 +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
Someone already pointed you to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
Please do take
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 05:30 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
As someone who maintained (and I mean that in all senses not just
applied patches) OSS projects while working full time and still trying
to have a life I get it. That said I never turned away patches solely
on style issues. At the same
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 03:33 +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Someone already pointed you to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
> Please do take a look there. I just did and found that in last three
> months, about 3500 patches were submitted to this list, i.e. about
> 40 patches per day (including
er.kernel.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 9:33:55 PM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > My gripe here is suppose I spend professional paid time working on
> > an
> > AH patch to [in
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> My gripe here is suppose I spend professional paid time working on an
> AH patch to [in my opinion] fix it and then I get
> ignored/stonewalled/etc because I didn't cross a t or dot an i ...
...
> ... if the likelihood of seeing it in
- Original Message -
> From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P"
> To: "Tom St Denis"
> Cc: "David Miller" , "steffen klassert"
> ,
> herb...@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Fr
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 03:53:44PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> Admittedly I'm new to the kernel scene but what exactly is a "maintainer"
> then?
Maintainers are ultimately responsible for content that flows into a tree
or subsystem. That means they must command a level of expertise on
- Original Message -
> From: "David Miller"
> To: tstde...@elliptictech.com
> Cc: "steffen klassert" ,
> herb...@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> net...@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 2:50:05 PM
> Subject: Re
From: Tom St Denis
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:33 -0500 (EST)
> Any "maintainers" going to reply to this at all?
What do you mean? There was a reply, and the reply if someone
so skilled finds this facility useful they can feel free to
submit an implementation.
You can't force people to
Sent: Wednesday, 16 January, 2013 1:21:04 AM
> Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
>
> Please Cc net...@vger.kernel.org on all networking related topics.
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The AH4/6 code uses ahash
: Wednesday, 16 January, 2013 1:21:04 AM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
Please Cc net...@vger.kernel.org on all networking related topics.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
Hi all,
The AH4/6 code uses ahash to perform the MAC calculation
From: Tom St Denis tstde...@elliptictech.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:33 -0500 (EST)
Any maintainers going to reply to this at all?
What do you mean? There was a reply, and the reply if someone
so skilled finds this facility useful they can feel free to
submit an implementation.
You
: IPsec AH use of ahash
From: Tom St Denis tstde...@elliptictech.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:33 -0500 (EST)
Any maintainers going to reply to this at all?
What do you mean? There was a reply, and the reply if someone
so skilled finds this facility useful they can feel free to
submit
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 03:53:44PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
Admittedly I'm new to the kernel scene but what exactly is a maintainer
then?
Maintainers are ultimately responsible for content that flows into a tree
or subsystem. That means they must command a level of expertise on
everything
...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 5:16:14 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 03:53:44PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
Admittedly I'm new to the kernel scene but what exactly is a
maintainer then?
Maintainers are ultimately responsible for content that flows
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
My gripe here is suppose I spend professional paid time working on an
AH patch to [in my opinion] fix it and then I get
ignored/stonewalled/etc because I didn't cross a t or dot an i ...
...
... if the likelihood of seeing it in
-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
net...@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 9:33:55 PM
Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:31:45PM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
My gripe here is suppose I spend professional paid time working on
an
AH patch to [in my opinion] fix
On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 03:33 +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
Someone already pointed you to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
Please do take a look there. I just did and found that in last three
months, about 3500 patches were submitted to this list, i.e. about
40 patches per day (including weekends
Please Cc net...@vger.kernel.org on all networking related topics.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The AH4/6 code uses ahash to perform the MAC calculation but this precludes
> the availability of GMAC to the user. Are there any plans to port the AH
Please Cc net...@vger.kernel.org on all networking related topics.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Tom St Denis wrote:
Hi all,
The AH4/6 code uses ahash to perform the MAC calculation but this precludes
the availability of GMAC to the user. Are there any plans to port the AH
88 matches
Mail list logo
