On Thursday 31 May 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> On Do, 24.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Improved patch - this time the issue should be fixed for good (I was
> > looking only at the RAID specific part of the fixups and I
On Thursday 31 May 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
On Do, 24.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Improved patch - this time the issue should be fixed for good (I was
looking only at the RAID specific part of the fixups and I overlooked
the
On Do, 24.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> Improved patch - this time the issue should be fixed for good (I was
> looking only at the RAID specific part of the fixups and I overlooked
> the fact that the original code was clearing too much
On Do, 24.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Improved patch - this time the issue should be fixed for good (I was
looking only at the RAID specific part of the fixups and I overlooked
the fact that the original code was clearing too much of
Hi,
On Friday 18 May 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> On Mi, 16.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > Shall I test it without "noraid=1" too?
> >
> > Please do, the main goal of the patch was to fix "RAID mode"
> > ("noraid=1" should work fine also without the
Hi,
On Friday 18 May 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
On Mi, 16.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shall I test it without noraid=1 too?
Please do, the main goal of the patch was to fix RAID mode
(noraid=1 should work fine also without the patch?).
On Mi, 16.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Shall I test it without "noraid=1" too?
>
> Please do, the main goal of the patch was to fix "RAID mode"
> ("noraid=1" should work fine also without the patch?).
>
> Thanks,
> Bart
Hi,
sorry for late response. Now
On Mi, 16.05.07 11:46 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shall I test it without noraid=1 too?
Please do, the main goal of the patch was to fix RAID mode
(noraid=1 should work fine also without the patch?).
Thanks,
Bart
Hi,
sorry for late response. Now the results in
> The real problem seems to be that IT821x "virtual" ID misses info
> about supported DMA modes (while it seems to contain enabled DMA
> mode info).
It does at least for the RAID volumes which are quite peculiar and seem
to have been defined by flipping bits until Windows worked 8)
> [ Patch is
Hi,
On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
> On Mi, 16.05.07 02:58 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
> > > Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > >
On Mi, 16.05.07 02:58 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
> > Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE
> > > 8212
On Mi, 16.05.07 02:58 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE
8212 controller.
Now I saw
Hi,
On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Thomas Kuther wrote:
On Mi, 16.05.07 02:58 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem
The real problem seems to be that IT821x virtual ID misses info
about supported DMA modes (while it seems to contain enabled DMA
mode info).
It does at least for the RAID volumes which are quite peculiar and seem
to have been defined by flipping bits until Windows worked 8)
[ Patch is based
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
> Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
> > controller.
> > Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a
On Di, 15.05.07 12:48 Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I already tried pata_it821x and it failed to recognize the second
> > harddisk hdf. I use the controller only for additional harddrives,
> > no RAID, no cd-rom.
>
> Logs from that would be most helpful as I am maintaining the
>
> I already tried pata_it821x and it failed to recognize the second
> harddisk hdf. I use the controller only for additional harddrives, no
> RAID, no cd-rom.
Logs from that would be most helpful as I am maintaining the pata_it821x
driver.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Di, 15.05.07 12:31 Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
> Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
> > controller.
> > Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and
On Di, 15.05.07 12:53 Thomas Kuther wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
> controller.
> Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try,
> but the problem persists.
>
Back on 2.6.20 - here is some output from the working
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
> controller.
> Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try, but
> the problem persists.
I've had multiple reports of
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
controller.
Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try, but
the problem persists.
It seems that DMA is broken on it8212 somehow since the merge of
the it8213 driver.
dmesg shows some BUG DMA OFF:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
controller.
Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try, but
the problem persists.
It seems that DMA is broken on it8212 somehow since the merge of
the it8213 driver.
dmesg shows some BUG DMA OFF:
On Di, 15.05.07 12:53 Thomas Kuther wrote:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
controller.
Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try,
but the problem persists.
Back on 2.6.20 - here is some output from the working driver.
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
controller.
Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try, but
the problem persists.
I've had multiple reports of this. I
On Di, 15.05.07 12:31 Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
controller.
Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try,
I already tried pata_it821x and it failed to recognize the second
harddisk hdf. I use the controller only for additional harddrives, no
RAID, no cd-rom.
Logs from that would be most helpful as I am maintaining the pata_it821x
driver.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Di, 15.05.07 12:48 Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already tried pata_it821x and it failed to recognize the second
harddisk hdf. I use the controller only for additional harddrives,
no RAID, no cd-rom.
Logs from that would be most helpful as I am maintaining the
pata_it821x
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:53:08 +0200
Thomas Kuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Since 2.6.21 I have a problem with the it821x driver on my ITE 8212
controller.
Now I saw some updates to it821x in 2.6.22-rc1 and gave that a try, but
the
28 matches
Mail list logo
