On 03/31/17 03:03, Radu Rendec wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 20:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
Does anyone still have a copy of Ingo Molnar's mmap-perf.c
program (the
old link is broken)?
On 03/31/17 03:03, Radu Rendec wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 20:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
Does anyone still have a copy of Ingo Molnar's mmap-perf.c
program (the
old link is broken)? Would it still be
On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 20:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
> > > Does anyone still have a copy of Ingo Molnar's mmap-perf.c
> > > program (the
> > > old link is broken)? Would it still be relevant to use it for
On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 20:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
> > > Does anyone still have a copy of Ingo Molnar's mmap-perf.c
> > > program (the
> > > old link is broken)? Would it still be relevant to use it for
> > > measuring
> > >
* Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and
> > XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on
* Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and
> > XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on this topic and the
On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and
> XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on this topic and the conclusion
> back then was that the
On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and
> XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on this topic and the conclusion
> back then was that the
Hi,
I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and
XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on this topic and the conclusion
back then was that the performance impact was (arguably) around 1%.
Does anyone
Hi,
I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and
XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on this topic and the conclusion
back then was that the performance impact was (arguably) around 1%.
Does anyone
10 matches
Mail list logo