Re: Is anyone else getting a bad signature from kernel.org's 5.8 sources+Greg's sign?

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:20:38PM -0400, David Niklas wrote: > On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:36:08 -0700 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 8/5/20 5:59 PM, David Niklas wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I downloaded the kernel sources from kernel.org using curl, then > > > opera, and finally lynx (to rule out an ht

Re: Is anyone else getting a bad signature from kernel.org's 5.8 sources+Greg's sign?

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:36:08 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 8/5/20 5:59 PM, David Niklas wrote: > > Hello, > > I downloaded the kernel sources from kernel.org using curl, then > > opera, and finally lynx (to rule out an html parsing bug). I did the > > same with the sign and I keep getting: > > >

Re:Use the script already there.. Is anyone else getting a bad signature from kernel.org's 5.8 sources+Greg's sign?

On 20:59 Wed 05 Aug 2020, David Niklas wrote: Hello, I downloaded the kernel sources from kernel.org using curl, then opera, and finally lynx (to rule out an html parsing bug). I did the same with the sign and I keep getting: % gpg2 --verify linux-5.8.tar.sign linux-5.8.tar.xz gpg: Signature ma

Re: Is anyone else getting a bad signature from kernel.org's 5.8 sources+Greg's sign?

On 8/5/20 5:59 PM, David Niklas wrote: > Hello, > I downloaded the kernel sources from kernel.org using curl, then > opera, and finally lynx (to rule out an html parsing bug). I did the same > with the sign and I keep getting: > > % gpg2 --verify linux-5.8.tar.sign linux-5.8.tar.xz > gpg: Signatu

Is anyone else getting a bad signature from kernel.org's 5.8 sources+Greg's sign?

Hello, I downloaded the kernel sources from kernel.org using curl, then opera, and finally lynx (to rule out an html parsing bug). I did the same with the sign and I keep getting: % gpg2 --verify linux-5.8.tar.sign linux-5.8.tar.xz gpg: Signature made Mon Aug 3 00:19:13 2020 EDT gpg: