[PATCH v2] Kbuild: Update config_data.gz only if KCONFIG_CONFIG materially changed

If you update the timestamp of KCONFIG_CONFIG without actually changing anything, config_data.gz is re-generated and causes vmlinux to re-link. When Link Time Optimization is enabled, unnecessary re-linking of vmlinux is highly desirable since it adds several minutes to build time. Avoid touching

Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Update config_data.gz only if KCONFIG_CONFIG materially changed

On 4/2/2021 10:11 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 7:45 AM Elliot Berman wrote: If you update the timestamp of KCONFIG_CONFIG without actually changing anything, config_data.gz is re-generated and causes vmlinux to re-link. When Link Time Optimization is enabled, unnecessary

Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Update config_data.gz only if KCONFIG_CONFIG materially changed

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 7:45 AM Elliot Berman wrote: > > If you update the timestamp of KCONFIG_CONFIG without actually changing > anything, config_data.gz is re-generated and causes vmlinux to re-link. > When Link Time Optimization is enabled, unnecessary re-linking of > vmlinux is highly

[PATCH] Kbuild: Update config_data.gz only if KCONFIG_CONFIG materially changed

If you update the timestamp of KCONFIG_CONFIG without actually changing anything, config_data.gz is re-generated and causes vmlinux to re-link. When Link Time Optimization is enabled, unnecessary re-linking of vmlinux is highly desirable since it adds several minutes to build time. Avoid touching

[PATCH v2] kbuild: update compile-test header list for v5.4-rc2

Commit 6dc280ebeed2 ("coda: remove uapi/linux/coda_psdev.h") removed a header in question. Some more build errors were fixed. Add more headers into the test coverage. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v2: - remove linux/coda_psdev.h as well usr/include/Makefile | 10 --

[PATCH 1/3] kbuild: update compile-test header list for v5.4-rc1

Some build errors were fixed. Add more headers into the test coverage. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- usr/include/Makefile | 9 - 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/include/Makefile b/usr/include/Makefile index 05c71ef42f51..4ef9946775ee 100644 ---

[PATCH] kbuild: update comment about KBUILD_ALLDIRS

Commit 000ec95fbe75 ("kbuild: pkg: rename scripts/package/Makefile to scripts/Makefile.package") missed to update this comment. Fixes: 000ec95fbe75 ("kbuild: pkg: rename scripts/package/Makefile to scripts/Makefile.package") Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Makefile | 2 +- 1 file changed,

[PATCH v2] kbuild: update compile-test headers for v5.3-rc1

- Some headers graduated from the blacklist - hyperv_timer.h joined the header-test when CONFIG_X86=y - nf_tables*.h joined the header-test when CONFIG_NF_TABLES is enabled. - The entry for nf_tables_offload.h was added to fix build error for the combination of CONFIG_NF_TABLES=n and

[PATCH 2/2] kbuild: update header compile-test list for v5.3-rc1

Some headers graduated from the blacklist. Let hyperv_timer.h join the header-test when CONFIG_X86=y. Add CONFIG guards to nf_tables*.h because they can be compiled when CONFIG_NF_TABLES is enabled. Add a new entry for nf_tables_offload.h to fix the build error for the combination of

[PATCH 1/3] kbuild: update comment block of scripts/clang-version.sh

Commit 469cb7376c06 ("kconfig: add CC_IS_CLANG and CLANG_VERSION") changed the code, but missed to update the comment block. The -p option was gone, and the output is 5-digit (or 6-digit when Clang 10 is released). Update the comment now. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada ---

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias list

2018-07-05 4:57 GMT+09:00 Randy Dunlap : > From: Randy Dunlap > > In Kbuild documentation, add alias for 64-bit sh ARCH ("sh64") > to the list of ARCH aliases. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > --- > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt |1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > ---

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias list

2018-07-05 4:57 GMT+09:00 Randy Dunlap : > From: Randy Dunlap > > In Kbuild documentation, add alias for 64-bit sh ARCH ("sh64") > to the list of ARCH aliases. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > --- > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt |1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > ---

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias list

as x86 and sparc have aliases. > x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit > +sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit > sparc: sparc for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit > > CROSS_COMPILE > Looks good. I will change the subject to kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias info for sh I se

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias list

as x86 and sparc have aliases. > x86: i386 for 32 bit, x86_64 for 64 bit > +sh: sh for 32 bit, sh64 for 64 bit > sparc: sparc for 32 bit, sparc64 for 64 bit > > CROSS_COMPILE > Looks good. I will change the subject to kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias info for sh I se

[PATCH] kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias list

From: Randy Dunlap In Kbuild documentation, add alias for 64-bit sh ARCH ("sh64") to the list of ARCH aliases. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap --- Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-next-20180704.orig/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt +++

[PATCH] kbuild: update kbuild.txt ARCH alias list

From: Randy Dunlap In Kbuild documentation, add alias for 64-bit sh ARCH ("sh64") to the list of ARCH aliases. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap --- Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-next-20180704.orig/Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.txt +++

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update comments of Makefile.asm-generic

2017-08-22 22:09 GMT+09:00 Cao jin : > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > --- Applied to linux-kbuild/fixes. Thanks. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update comments of Makefile.asm-generic

2017-08-22 22:09 GMT+09:00 Cao jin : > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > --- Applied to linux-kbuild/fixes. Thanks. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada

[PATCH] kbuild: update comments of Makefile.asm-generic

Signed-off-by: Cao jin --- scripts/Makefile.asm-generic | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic b/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic index 95f7d80..a6c8c17 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic +++

[PATCH] kbuild: update comments of Makefile.asm-generic

Signed-off-by: Cao jin --- scripts/Makefile.asm-generic | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic b/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic index 95f7d80..a6c8c17 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic +++ b/scripts/Makefile.asm-generic @@ -1,9

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 14:36:02 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > Will this go to Linux v4.13 or v4.14? It's queued for 4.14. jon

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 14:36:02 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > Will this go to Linux v4.13 or v4.14? It's queued for 4.14. jon

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:27:05 +0200 > Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> The old example to describe ccflags-y usage is no more valid. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek > > I've applied

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:27:05 +0200 > Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> The old example to describe ccflags-y usage is no more valid. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek > > I've applied this; had to clean up some whitespace weirdness on the way. >

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:27:05 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > The old example to describe ccflags-y usage is no more valid. > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek I've applied this; had to clean up some whitespace weirdness on the way. Thanks, jon

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 17:27:05 +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > The old example to describe ccflags-y usage is no more valid. > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek I've applied this; had to clean up some whitespace weirdness on the way. Thanks, jon

[PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

From: Sedat Dilek The old example to describe ccflags-y usage is no more valid. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH] kbuild: Update example for ccflags-y usage

From: Sedat Dilek The old example to describe ccflags-y usage is no more valid. Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek --- Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt b/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt

[PATCH] kbuild: Update documentation of clean-files and clean-dirs

Commit a16c5f99 (kbuild: Fix removal of the debian/ directory) slightly changed the processing of the clean-files and clean-dirs variables. Also, use a current real-world example of clean-files usage. Signed-off-by: Michal Marek --- Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt | 11 +-- 1 file

[PATCH] kbuild: Update documentation of clean-files and clean-dirs

Commit a16c5f99 (kbuild: Fix removal of the debian/ directory) slightly changed the processing of the clean-files and clean-dirs variables. Also, use a current real-world example of clean-files usage. Signed-off-by: Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz --- Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt | 11

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update headers_install.txt document

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:45:41 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > The arch header directories "include/asm-*" were moved long ago. > Now we should check the existence of arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild > to see if an architecture supports the headers installation. > (Actually, "um" is the only

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: update headers_install.txt document

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:45:41 +0900 Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: The arch header directories include/asm-* were moved long ago. Now we should check the existence of arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild to see if an architecture supports the headers installation. (Actually, um is

[PATCH] kbuild: update headers_install.txt document

The arch header directories "include/asm-*" were moved long ago. Now we should check the existence of arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild to see if an architecture supports the headers installation. (Actually, "um" is the only architecture that does not have it.) Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada ---

[PATCH] kbuild: update headers_install.txt document

The arch header directories include/asm-* were moved long ago. Now we should check the existence of arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild to see if an architecture supports the headers installation. (Actually, um is the only architecture that does not have it.) Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

[PATCH 10/32] perf kbuild: update kbuild files according to last changes

--- tools/perf/Kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild| 30 +- tools/perf/ui/browsers/Kbuild | 1 + tools/perf/util/Kbuild| 1 + 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/Kbuild b/tools/perf/Kbuild index

[PATCH 29/32] perf kbuild: update build test configurations

--- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/tests/configs/MINIMAL_config| 4 +++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BACKTRACE_config | 2 ++ .../perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_ANNOTATE_config | 2 ++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_BENCH_config |

[PATCH 28/32] perf kbuild: update Kbuild files with new and removed sources

--- tools/perf/bench/Kbuild | 3 +++ tools/perf/util/Kbuild | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild index 57f87e8..863646a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ obj-y +=

[PATCH 28/32] perf kbuild: update Kbuild files with new and removed sources

--- tools/perf/bench/Kbuild | 3 +++ tools/perf/util/Kbuild | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild index 57f87e8..863646a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ obj-y +=

[PATCH 29/32] perf kbuild: update build test configurations

--- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/tests/configs/MINIMAL_config| 4 +++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BACKTRACE_config | 2 ++ .../perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_ANNOTATE_config | 2 ++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_BENCH_config |

[PATCH 10/32] perf kbuild: update kbuild files according to last changes

--- tools/perf/Kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild| 30 +- tools/perf/ui/browsers/Kbuild | 1 + tools/perf/util/Kbuild| 1 + 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/Kbuild b/tools/perf/Kbuild index

[PATCH 11/34] perf kbuild: update kbuild files according to last changes

--- tools/perf/Kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild| 30 +- tools/perf/ui/browsers/Kbuild | 1 + tools/perf/util/Kbuild| 1 + 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/Kbuild b/tools/perf/Kbuild index

[PATCH 30/34] perf kbuild: update Kbuild files with new and removed sources

--- tools/perf/bench/Kbuild | 3 +++ tools/perf/util/Kbuild | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild index 57f87e8..863646a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ obj-y +=

[PATCH 31/34] perf kbuild: update build test configurations

--- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/tests/configs/MINIMAL_config| 4 +++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BACKTRACE_config | 2 ++ .../perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_ANNOTATE_config | 2 ++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_BENCH_config |

[PATCH 31/34] perf kbuild: update build test configurations

--- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/tests/configs/MINIMAL_config| 4 +++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BACKTRACE_config | 2 ++ .../perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_ANNOTATE_config | 2 ++ tools/perf/tests/configs/NO_BUILTIN_BENCH_config |

[PATCH 30/34] perf kbuild: update Kbuild files with new and removed sources

--- tools/perf/bench/Kbuild | 3 +++ tools/perf/util/Kbuild | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild index 57f87e8..863646a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild +++ b/tools/perf/bench/Kbuild @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ obj-y +=

[PATCH 11/34] perf kbuild: update kbuild files according to last changes

--- tools/perf/Kbuild | 2 +- tools/perf/Makefile.kbuild| 30 +- tools/perf/ui/browsers/Kbuild | 1 + tools/perf/util/Kbuild| 1 + 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/Kbuild b/tools/perf/Kbuild index

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

> >ftp://flower.upol.cz/upload/Configure.help > >OK, please, take a look at stuff, Korean guys did 5-6 years ago. One >particular ARM port (S3C2410X) along with an ARM bootloader (vivi) was >done. Yet for some reason official Linux port has another developers, and, >it seems, it was done some

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

ftp://flower.upol.cz/upload/Configure.help OK, please, take a look at stuff, Korean guys did 5-6 years ago. One particular ARM port (S3C2410X) along with an ARM bootloader (vivi) was done. Yet for some reason official Linux port has another developers, and, it seems, it was done some time (~1-2

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

@ Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:22:08AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > >"I will use ... > >http://images.google.cz/images?svnum=100=1=cs=firefox-a=org.mozilla%3Acs%3Aofficial=I+will+use+Google+before=Hledat+obr%C3%A1zky > >... for making translations..." >

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

@ Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:22:08AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: I will use ... http://images.google.cz/images?svnum=100um=1hl=csclient=firefox-arls=org.mozilla%3Acs%3Aofficialq=I+will+use+Google+beforebtnG=Hledat+obr%C3%A1zky ... for making translations...

Re: Kbuild update

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:32:39AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > >> > If we can make this to be an offical project for Linux kernel, I > >> > think it won't be a big problem. > >> > >> We don't even manage to maintain the English language texts properly, > >> and I am therefore not overly

Re: Kbuild update

>> > If we can make this to be an offical project for Linux kernel, I >> > think it won't be a big problem. >> >> We don't even manage to maintain the English language texts properly, >> and I am therefore not overly optimistic that we'll have the >> translations maintained properly for many

Re: Kbuild update

> >"only" is the wrong word in this context. > >If someone would update the translations for one language every >3 months for the next years that would be great and disprove my >concerns. > >After all, updates every 3 months would beat the maintainance level of >at least three of our

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

>"I will use ... >http://images.google.cz/images?svnum=100=1=cs=firefox-a=org.mozilla%3Acs%3Aofficial=I+will+use+Google+before=Hledat+obr%C3%A1zky >... for making translations..." >http://www.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Flxr.linux.no%2Flinux%2FDocumentation%2FHOWTO=en%7Czh-TW=en=UTF8 >? >

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

I will use ... http://images.google.cz/images?svnum=100um=1hl=csclient=firefox-arls=org.mozilla%3Acs%3Aofficialq=I+will+use+Google+beforebtnG=Hledat+obr%C3%A1zky ... for making translations...

Re: Kbuild update

only is the wrong word in this context. If someone would update the translations for one language every 3 months for the next years that would be great and disprove my concerns. After all, updates every 3 months would beat the maintainance level of at least three of our architectures...

Re: Kbuild update

If we can make this to be an offical project for Linux kernel, I think it won't be a big problem. We don't even manage to maintain the English language texts properly, and I am therefore not overly optimistic that we'll have the translations maintained properly for many years. Italian

Re: Kbuild update

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:32:39AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: If we can make this to be an offical project for Linux kernel, I think it won't be a big problem. We don't even manage to maintain the English language texts properly, and I am therefore not overly optimistic that we'll have

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

> > Also, future of the linux codebase with Chinese comments in C or in > ASM is kind of wired nightmare. Those, who cannot read actual source > code (i.e. C) will not go too far. $subject is purely about the kernel configuration - if that was not clear. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this

translations (Re: Kbuild update)

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:26:06PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > >> It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. > >> What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to > >> see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel > >> for a

Re: Kbuild update

> > And don't underestimate the amount of work required - even when talking > about requiring "only" 10% of the help texts translated that's a four > digit number of lines to translate. The .pot file is 80601 lines long and contains 11485 strings. [Not counting cris architecture specific

Re: Kbuild update

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:26:06PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > >> It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. > >> What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to > >> see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel > >> for a

Re: Kbuild update

>> It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. >> What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to >> see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel >> for a number of languages. >> >> One criteria to get a .po file integrated

Re: translations (Re: Kbuild update)

Also, future of the linux codebase with Chinese comments in C or in ASM is kind of wired nightmare. Those, who cannot read actual source code (i.e. C) will not go too far. $subject is purely about the kernel configuration - if that was not clear. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: Kbuild update

It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel for a number of languages. One criteria to get a .po file integrated could be at

Re: Kbuild update

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:26:06PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel for a number of

Re: Kbuild update

And don't underestimate the amount of work required - even when talking about requiring only 10% of the help texts translated that's a four digit number of lines to translate. The .pot file is 80601 lines long and contains 11485 strings. [Not counting cris architecture specific strings as

translations (Re: Kbuild update)

On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:26:06PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: It sort of stopped at one point due to missing integration in mainline. What I refer to is mostly the mconf.c bits, but I would also like to see what lkml says to a sample of .po files included in the kernel for a number of

Re: Kbuild update

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:23:16PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > > > {snip} > > > > >TODO items (from my mailbox - I have plenty more) > > >= >... > > >- i18n patch for mconf and friends

stuff (Re: Kbuild update)

On Jan 4, 2008 9:09 PM, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 4 2008 20:43, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> > >> On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >> > > >> >On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: >

Re: Kbuild update

On Jan 4 2008 20:43, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> >> On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> > >> >On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: >> >- modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others) >> >>

Re: Kbuild update

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > >On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: > >- modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others) > > Sorry.. your comparison {menuconfig, htop} raises

Re: Kbuild update

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:23:16PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > {snip} > > >TODO items (from my mailbox - I have plenty more) > >= > >- asm-offset useable from modules (Oleg had a half backed solution) > >- modpost should use err(), warn() etc

Re: Kbuild update

{snip} >TODO items (from my mailbox - I have plenty more) >= >- asm-offset useable from modules (Oleg had a half backed solution) >- modpost should use err(), warn() etc (suggestyed by Rusty) >- less kernel hardcoding in kconfig (Rob Landley) >-

Re: Kbuild update

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:23:16PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: {snip} TODO items (from my mailbox - I have plenty more) = - asm-offset useable from modules (Oleg had a half backed solution) - modpost should use err(), warn() etc (suggestyed by

Re: Kbuild update

{snip} TODO items (from my mailbox - I have plenty more) = - asm-offset useable from modules (Oleg had a half backed solution) - modpost should use err(), warn() etc (suggestyed by Rusty) - less kernel hardcoding in kconfig (Rob Landley) - emit

Re: Kbuild update

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: - modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others) Sorry.. your comparison {menuconfig, htop} raises an

Re: Kbuild update

On Jan 4 2008 20:43, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: - modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others) Sorry.. your

stuff (Re: Kbuild update)

On Jan 4, 2008 9:09 PM, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 4 2008 20:43, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:33:44PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: - modern ncurses

Re: Kbuild update

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:23:16PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: {snip} TODO items (from my mailbox - I have plenty more) = ... - i18n patch for mconf and friends (from Kernel

Re: Kbuild update

On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: >- modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others) Sorry.. your comparison {menuconfig, htop} raises an "incompatible pointer passed" on my side. Please explain :) >TODO items

Re: Kbuild update

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:32:55 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > kbuild.git contains at the moment 36 patches which is all for the upcoming > merge window. > It has been rebased to latest -linus git tree. > See shortlog below. > > Pending patches > === > kbuild: [snip] >

Kbuild update

kbuild.git contains at the moment 36 patches which is all for the upcoming merge window. It has been rebased to latest -linus git tree. See shortlog below. Pending patches === kbuild: - Section garbage collection (Denys Vlasenko) I had too little time to play with it so it will not

Kbuild update

kbuild.git contains at the moment 36 patches which is all for the upcoming merge window. It has been rebased to latest -linus git tree. See shortlog below. Pending patches === kbuild: - Section garbage collection (Denys Vlasenko) I had too little time to play with it so it will not

Re: Kbuild update

On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:32:55 +0100 Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kbuild.git contains at the moment 36 patches which is all for the upcoming merge window. It has been rebased to latest -linus git tree. See shortlog below. Pending patches === kbuild: [snip] - merge

Re: Kbuild update

On Jan 3 2008 22:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On top of this I have my personal todo items such as: - modern ncurses interface for menuconfig (ala tig, htop and others) Sorry.. your comparison {menuconfig, htop} raises an incompatible pointer passed on my side. Please explain :) TODO items (from

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 12:23:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:58:03 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for > > > kbuild.

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:58:03 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for > > kbuild. > > The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: > ...

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for > > > kbuild. > > > The shortlog below have additional details

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for > > kbuild. > > The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: > ... > > o add script to

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. > The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: ... > o add script to find unused kconfig symbols (try it!) based on my experiences with this, unless you

kbuild update

A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: o Make the kernel buildable on a cygwin box (but not without a few glitches) o detect unterminated device id list o add export_report as a valid

kbuild update

A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: o Make the kernel buildable on a cygwin box (but not without a few glitches) o detect unterminated device id list o add export_report as a valid

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: ... o add script to find unused kconfig symbols (try it!) based on my experiences with this, unless you

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: ... o add script to find unused

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog below have additional details but the

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog below have additional details but the headlines are: ... o add

Re: kbuild update

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 12:23:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: A summary of what is planned to be submitted in next merge window for kbuild. The shortlog

[GIT PULL] kbuild update

Hi Linus. Another smaller round of kbuild updates. The important bit is the fix so we no longer warn too much on second pass of modpost - section mismatch is avoided for vmlinux in second pass. The 'larger' patch is a simple kconfig update I have used locally. An earlier variant was reviewed

[GIT PULL] kbuild update

Hi Linus. Another smaller round of kbuild updates. The important bit is the fix so we no longer warn too much on second pass of modpost - section mismatch is avoided for vmlinux in second pass. The 'larger' patch is a simple kconfig update I have used locally. An earlier variant was reviewed

  1   2   >