Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> > Hi, everybody.
> >
> > Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
> > 2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
> >
> > I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:38:19 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> "J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
> > with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
>
> install the last egcs package from 7.2b and compile with kgcc
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:37:21 Andre Tomt wrote:
>
> I have to be wicked crazy - but:
> Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
> (experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
>
> It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
> The reason I tried the
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> Hi, everybody.
>
> Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
> 2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
>
> I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and the compilation process
there is no such thing
Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>
> > > I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
> >
> > egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
> > to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
> > In truth I think
> > I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
>
> egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
> to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
> In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if
> > In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything kernel side is
> > broken it must be fairly obscure or a little used driver
>
> I've been using 2.95.2 to build PPC kernels and it seems to work
> OK, but I _know_ that 2.91.66 works with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so it should
>
> I have to be wicked crazy - but:
> Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
> (experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
>
> It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
> The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option.
Let
Hello,
> > I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
>
> egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
> to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
> In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where
> What do you mean by _the_ recommended compiler? Is 2.7.2.3 recommended no
> more? Is there some benefit using egcs-1.1.2 instead of 2.7.2.3?
>
> Should Changes be changed?
Umm looks like it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
"J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
> with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
install the last egcs package from 7.2b and compile with kgcc (will be
autodetect by the kernel).
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
I have to be wicked crazy - but:
Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
(experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option.
--
Andre Tomt
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
> to build it. Its also the recommended compiler.
What do you mean by _the_ recommended compiler? Is 2.7.2.3 recommended no
more? Is there some benefit using
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
to build it. Its also the recommended compiler.
What do you mean by _the_ recommended compiler? Is 2.7.2.3 recommended no
more? Is there some benefit using
I have to be wicked crazy - but:
Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
(experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option.
--
Andre Tomt
"J . A . Magallon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
install the last egcs package from 7.2b and compile with kgcc (will be
autodetect by the kernel).
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
What do you mean by _the_ recommended compiler? Is 2.7.2.3 recommended no
more? Is there some benefit using egcs-1.1.2 instead of 2.7.2.3?
Should Changes be changed?
Umm looks like it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Hello,
I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if
I have to be wicked crazy - but:
Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
(experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option.
Let me
In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything kernel side is
broken it must be fairly obscure or a little used driver
I've been using 2.95.2 to build PPC kernels and it seems to work
OK, but I _know_ that 2.91.66 works with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so it should
probably be
I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything
Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
In truth I think 2.95 is now at
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
Hi, everybody.
Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and the compilation process
there is no such thing as
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:37:21 Andre Tomt wrote:
I have to be wicked crazy - but:
Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010
(experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000
It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet.
The reason I tried the kernel
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:38:19 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
"J . A . Magallon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
install the last egcs package from 7.2b and compile with kgcc (will be
Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote:
Hi, everybody.
Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and the
> I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything kernel
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:30:57 Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> Forget 2.96. It's a prerelease, and produces broken kernel, IF it
> produces
> them.
>
> > TIA, and sorry for the 'long long' message...
>
> Read the docs. It says what works and what doens't.
>
Thanks, I thought 2.96 was a 'real'
> Hi, everybody.
>
> I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
> with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
> Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
> 2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
>
> I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from
Hi, everybody.
I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and the
Hi, everybody.
I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and the
Hi, everybody.
I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1
with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta).
Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain
2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15.
I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:30:57 Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
Forget 2.96. It's a prerelease, and produces broken kernel, IF it
produces
them.
TIA, and sorry for the 'long long' message...
Read the docs. It says what works and what doens't.
Thanks, I thought 2.96 was a 'real' version. This
I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX.
egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use
to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'.
In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything kernel
34 matches
Mail list logo
