Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-06 Thread Ion Badulescu
[s/rutgers.edu/kernel.org/] On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 09:19:12 +1100 (EST), Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday November 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> If multiple interrupts are hitting a single code path (like IDE irqs 14 >> -and- 15), you definitely have to think about that. The

Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-06 Thread Jason Straight
It may be a filesystem problem, I had a problem like this with a 200GB raid 0 array using reiserfs, it went down 3 times in 2 days. I switched to ext2 on md0 and everything has been fine now for weeks. On Sunday 05 November 2000 16:08, ryan wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried 2.4.0test10, but I get

Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-06 Thread Jason Straight
It may be a filesystem problem, I had a problem like this with a 200GB raid 0 array using reiserfs, it went down 3 times in 2 days. I switched to ext2 on md0 and everything has been fine now for weeks. On Sunday 05 November 2000 16:08, ryan wrote: Hi, I tried 2.4.0test10, but I get a

Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-05 Thread ryan
> Which tells us precisely nothing. Saying "a message like" is no good. > You need to follow the procedure in linux/REPORTING-BUGS, including the > _exact_ message, run through ksymoops if necessary. Ok, for your enlightenment: -- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look -- unusual

Re: Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-05 Thread Keith Owens
On Sun, 05 Nov 2000 13:08:41 -0800, ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Kernel oops. A message like: > >"Detected LOCKUP on CPU0" >or sometimes its CPU1... Which tells us precisely nothing. Saying "a message like" is no good. You need to follow the procedure in linux/REPORTING-BUGS, including the

Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-05 Thread ryan
Hi, I tried 2.4.0test10, but I get a kernel oops quite often. I have configured my kernel for raid and smp ... autodetected raid, in the kernel everything, so no raid modules necessary. But when I go to boot, it starts to reconstruct the raid array and fsck the /dev/md0 and eventually it just

Kernel 2.4.0test10 crash (RAID+SMP)

2000-11-05 Thread ryan
Hi, I tried 2.4.0test10, but I get a kernel oops quite often. I have configured my kernel for raid and smp ... autodetected raid, in the kernel everything, so no raid modules necessary. But when I go to boot, it starts to reconstruct the raid array and fsck the /dev/md0 and eventually it just