On 8/20/19 7:56 AM, shuah wrote:
On 8/20/19 12:58 AM, Nathan Royce wrote:
While your mention of quirks-table.h certainly had possibilities, I'm
afraid adding the "AU0828_DEVICE(0x05e1, 0x0400, "Hauppauge",
"Woodbury")," entry for my tuner did not make any difference regarding
the "Tuner is
On 8/20/19 12:58 AM, Nathan Royce wrote:
While your mention of quirks-table.h certainly had possibilities, I'm
afraid adding the "AU0828_DEVICE(0x05e1, 0x0400, "Hauppauge",
"Woodbury")," entry for my tuner did not make any difference regarding
the "Tuner is busy. Error -19" message.
I don't
While your mention of quirks-table.h certainly had possibilities, I'm
afraid adding the "AU0828_DEVICE(0x05e1, 0x0400, "Hauppauge",
"Woodbury")," entry for my tuner did not make any difference regarding
the "Tuner is busy. Error -19" message.
I don't know if this means anything, but I see
(resubmitting due to non "plain-text" causing virus bounce):
Hey Shuah, after these few days, I FINALLY completed bisecting... much
to my dismay...
It was my first foray into bisecting and it looked simple enough, but
for some reason every subsequent step resulted in a "bad" result.
*
$ git
(resubmitting due to non "reply-to-all"):
Bugger, I just sent a reply to your last message, but it bounced back with:
*
550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The message contains HTML
subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM or Outlook Virus. TEXT/PLAIN is
accepted.! BF:; S1728494AbfHSVzk
*
On 8/19/19 2:49 PM, shuah wrote:
On 8/16/19 7:15 PM, Nathan Royce wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:42 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
If you revert that one commit, does things start working again?
thanks,
greg k-h
Hey Greg, I just got finished building it after running "$ git revert
On 8/16/19 7:15 PM, Nathan Royce wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:42 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
If you revert that one commit, does things start working again?
thanks,
greg k-h
Hey Greg, I just got finished building it after running "$ git revert
812658d88d26" and verifying it reverted by
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:42 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> If you revert that one commit, does things start working again?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hey Greg, I just got finished building it after running "$ git revert
812658d88d26" and verifying it reverted by comparing one of the files
from git
Hi Nathan,
On 16/08/2019 13.18, Nathan Royce wrote:
> Right up front, I must say I do NOT have a Hauppauge tuner. I think
> it's like maybe Mygica/Geniatech:
> Bus 002 Device 004: ID 05e1:0400 Syntek Semiconductor Co., Ltd
>
> Whenever I update my kernel, I edit the
>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:18:01PM -0500, Nathan Royce wrote:
> Right up front, I must say I do NOT have a Hauppauge tuner. I think
> it's like maybe Mygica/Geniatech:
> Bus 002 Device 004: ID 05e1:0400 Syntek Semiconductor Co., Ltd
>
> Whenever I update my kernel, I edit the
>
Right up front, I must say I do NOT have a Hauppauge tuner. I think
it's like maybe Mygica/Geniatech:
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 05e1:0400 Syntek Semiconductor Co., Ltd
Whenever I update my kernel, I edit the
./drivers/media/usb/au0828/au0828-cards.c file adding an entry for my
0x400 device.
I've
11 matches
Mail list logo
