On Tuesday 27 March 2001 08:51, James Lewis Nance wrote:
> Instead I think we need to encourage people who want to use Linux,
> rather than develop it, to use kernels from a distribution.
I hope that's not the opinion of all the kernel developers - where does that
leave distributions like
I disagree, 2.4.x is "stable" and as such we need as many people to use
the kernels to see whats wrong with them. 2.4 *DOES* Work, I've had very
small problems (ok, the thread hanging issue was a big one) but other then
that It's been solid.
It depends on the hardware.
Shawn.
On Tue, 27 Mar
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:13:32AM -0800, David Konerding wrote:
> No, the point is that the linux developers should regression test their
> code BEFORE
> releasing it to the public as a version like "2.4.2". When I see a
> version like "2.4.2", I have an expectation that all the stupid little
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:13:32AM -0800, David Konerding wrote:
No, the point is that the linux developers should regression test their
code BEFORE
releasing it to the public as a version like "2.4.2". When I see a
version like "2.4.2", I have an expectation that all the stupid little
I disagree, 2.4.x is "stable" and as such we need as many people to use
the kernels to see whats wrong with them. 2.4 *DOES* Work, I've had very
small problems (ok, the thread hanging issue was a big one) but other then
that It's been solid.
It depends on the hardware.
Shawn.
On Tue, 27 Mar
On Tuesday 27 March 2001 08:51, James Lewis Nance wrote:
Instead I think we need to encourage people who want to use Linux,
rather than develop it, to use kernels from a distribution.
I hope that's not the opinion of all the kernel developers - where does that
leave distributions like
6 matches
Mail list logo
