On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:41:31 -0800,
Torrey Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
>part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
>official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -, you [mirabilos] claimed:
> From: "Torrey Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
> > part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
> > official sources, that good
From: "Torrey Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
> part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
> official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
> maintainers do the same.
>
>
Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
maintainers do the same.
Torrey Hoffman
>-Original Message-
>From:
Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
maintainers do the same.
Torrey Hoffman
-Original Message-
From: Keith
From: "Torrey Hoffman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
maintainers do the same.
Torrey
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -, you [mirabilos] claimed:
From: "Torrey Hoffman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
official sources, that good example
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:41:31 -0800,
Torrey Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:29:06PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:13:48 -0500,
> "Matthew Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
> >in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
> >know that Caldera 2.3
"Matthew Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
> in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
> know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that way(2.4 may also). If you
> have the install CDROM, the kernel source install may have
> it
Well, even if the config file hasn't been included you can
presumably _write_ the config file from the kernel setup
program...and that is _probably_ the configuration of the
kernel you are running n'est-ce-pas?
Roger.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Well, even if the config file hasn't been included you can
presumably _write_ the config file from the kernel setup
program...and that is _probably_ the configuration of the
kernel you are running n'est-ce-pas?
Roger.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
"Matthew Pitts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that way(2.4 may also). If you
have the install CDROM, the kernel source install may have
it (e.g.
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:29:06PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:13:48 -0500,
"Matthew Pitts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:13:48 -0500,
"Matthew Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
>in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
>know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that way(2.4 may also). If you
>have the install CDROM, the kernel
Matthew and Keith,
Thank you to both of you for your input, info, and quick responses. I
just wanted to make shure there weren't tricks still in the bag that I
hadn't learned about in this area. I'll look for the config file.
Jacob Anawalt
Matthew Pitts wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:06:57
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:06:57 +1100
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:21:41 -0700,
> Jacob Anawalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was
> compiled with,
> >if you dont have access to the source or configure files
>
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:21:41 -0700,
Jacob Anawalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was compiled with,
>if you dont have access to the source or configure files it was compiled
>off of?
No. You have to insist that whoever distributes the kernel
Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was compiled with,
if you dont have access to the source or configure files it was compiled
off of?
In particular, I am trying to discover if 'advanced router' and 'equal
cost multi path' options are compiled into RH7 kernel-2.2.16-22. I would
Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was compiled with,
if you dont have access to the source or configure files it was compiled
off of?
In particular, I am trying to discover if 'advanced router' and 'equal
cost multi path' options are compiled into RH7 kernel-2.2.16-22. I would
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:21:41 -0700,
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was compiled with,
if you dont have access to the source or configure files it was compiled
off of?
No. You have to insist that whoever distributes the kernel binary
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:06:57 +1100
Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:21:41 -0700,
Jacob Anawalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was
compiled with,
if you dont have access to the source or configure files
it was
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:13:48 -0500,
"Matthew Pitts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that way(2.4 may also). If you
have the install CDROM, the kernel source
23 matches
Mail list logo
