(btw ACPI 2.0 spec section 12.1.1 discusses this)
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > No, the ACPI standard requires CPUs to shut themselves down before
> > any damage would occur from overheading. Well, at least the 1.0b
> > version of the standard did; I haven't read 2.0 yet.
Hi!
> >PS: This seems very strange. What if machine is so crashed so that it
> >can no longer shutdown properly. Will that mean that its CPU will
> >damage itself?
>
> No, the ACPI standard requires CPUs to shut themselves down before
> any damage would occur from overheading. Well, at least
Hi!
PS: This seems very strange. What if machine is so crashed so that it
can no longer shutdown properly. Will that mean that its CPU will
damage itself?
No, the ACPI standard requires CPUs to shut themselves down before
any damage would occur from overheading. Well, at least the 1.0b
(btw ACPI 2.0 spec section 12.1.1 discusses this)
From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
No, the ACPI standard requires CPUs to shut themselves down before
any damage would occur from overheading. Well, at least the 1.0b
version of the standard did; I haven't read 2.0 yet.
BTW
>PS: This seems very strange. What if machine is so crashed so that it
>can no longer shutdown properly. Will that mean that its CPU will
>damage itself?
No, the ACPI standard requires CPUs to shut themselves down before
any damage would occur from overheading. Well, at least the 1.0b
version
Hi!
> We already have lid support in the latest ACPI versions (not in the official
> kernel yet.) You can download this code from
> http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm .
>
> It'd be great if you could focus your testing and patches on this code base
> -- I think it's a
Hi!
We already have lid support in the latest ACPI versions (not in the official
kernel yet.) You can download this code from
http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm .
It'd be great if you could focus your testing and patches on this code base
-- I think it's a lot
PS: This seems very strange. What if machine is so crashed so that it
can no longer shutdown properly. Will that mean that its CPU will
damage itself?
No, the ACPI standard requires CPUs to shut themselves down before
any damage would occur from overheading. Well, at least the 1.0b
version of
> > It'd be great if you could focus your testing and patches
> on this code base
> > -- I think it's a lot better but it's still a work in progress.
>
> Are you planning to merge to 2.4.4?
Planning on merging ASAP. That may be 2.4.4, we'll see.
> > PS I'm not quite sure why you copied the
Hi!
> We already have lid support in the latest ACPI versions (not in the official
> kernel yet.) You can download this code from
> http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm .
This site is as ugly as hell but does the trick. (And btw link to
"kernel howto" points to list of
better but it's still a work in progress.
Regards -- Andy
PS I'm not quite sure why you copied the acpi list *and* lkml.. ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Hi!
>
> Here's lid support for ACPI, please apply.
>
-
To unsubscribe fr
Hi!
Here's lid support for ACPI, please apply.
Pavel
--- clean/drivers/acpi/power.c Wed Jan 31 16:14:33 2001
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/power.c Sun Apr 22 23:02:25 2001
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
int acpi_cmbatt_init(void);
int
Hi!
Here's lid support for ACPI, please apply.
Pavel
--- clean/drivers/acpi/power.c Wed Jan 31 16:14:33 2001
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/power.c Sun Apr 22 23:02:25 2001
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
int acpi_cmbatt_init(void);
int
better but it's still a work in progress.
Regards -- Andy
PS I'm not quite sure why you copied the acpi list *and* lkml.. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Machek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi!
Here's lid support for ACPI, please apply.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi!
We already have lid support in the latest ACPI versions (not in the official
kernel yet.) You can download this code from
http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm .
This site is as ugly as hell but does the trick. (And btw link to
kernel howto points to list of
It'd be great if you could focus your testing and patches
on this code base
-- I think it's a lot better but it's still a work in progress.
Are you planning to merge to 2.4.4?
Planning on merging ASAP. That may be 2.4.4, we'll see.
PS I'm not quite sure why you copied the acpi list
16 matches
Mail list logo
