You must upgrade to the latest release: 4.0.1e
The fix for this problem went into 4.0.1d, but since you
need to upgrade, you might as well get the latest code.
Miles
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, David Luyer wrote:
>
> I'm having problems with X 4.0.1 and 2.4.0-test kernels on a Toshiba
I'm having problems with X 4.0.1 and 2.4.0-test kernels on a Toshiba Libretto
110CT. Is this likely to be related to a known problem or can someone
recommend some random intermediate kernel versions to try (binary elimination
avoiding known-bad kernel versions...)?
H/w: Toshiba Libretto 110CT
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:22:37AM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
> > You have a voodoo3 or voodoo5 with X4, and the DRI X4 module loaded.
> >
> > Or am I wrong?
>
> v3.. bingo :)
Comment out the 'Load "dri"' line from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, I'm
working on debugging the problems.
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 01:25:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Just happened with test10, same circumstances .. font map got corrupted, and
> > noise on the screen. Switching back and forth from X to a vc fixed it, tho.
> >
> > Sort of amusing that it (apparently) only happens with ppp
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 01:25:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just happened with test10, same circumstances .. font map got corrupted, and
noise on the screen. Switching back and forth from X to a vc fixed it, tho.
Sort of amusing that it (apparently) only happens with ppp + wget
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:22:37AM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
snip
You have a voodoo3 or voodoo5 with X4, and the DRI X4 module loaded.
Or am I wrong?
v3.. bingo :)
Comment out the 'Load "dri"' line from /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, I'm
working on debugging the problems.
I'm having problems with X 4.0.1 and 2.4.0-test kernels on a Toshiba Libretto
110CT. Is this likely to be related to a known problem or can someone
recommend some random intermediate kernel versions to try (binary elimination
avoiding known-bad kernel versions...)?
H/w: Toshiba Libretto 110CT
You must upgrade to the latest release: 4.0.1e
The fix for this problem went into 4.0.1d, but since you
need to upgrade, you might as well get the latest code.
Miles
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, David Luyer wrote:
I'm having problems with X 4.0.1 and 2.4.0-test kernels on a Toshiba
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Nov 02, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >2.2 O_SYNC is actually broken too --- it doesn't sync all metadata (in
> >particular, it doesn't update the
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:"Marco d'Itri" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
On Nov 02, "Stephen C. Tweedie" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.2 O_SYNC is actually broken too --- it doesn't sync all metadata (in
particular, it doesn't update the inode), but I'd
I have this problem also. I am running vesafb and X4.01 w/ a voodoo3500.
Switching to a vc sometimes gives you black text (hiliting w/ mouse fixes it) and
alternating green and red pixels across the top of the screen.
-b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:38:56PM +0100,
I have this problem also. I am running vesafb and X4.01 w/ a voodoo3500.
Switching to a vc sometimes gives you black text (hiliting w/ mouse fixes it) and
alternating green and red pixels across the top of the screen.
-b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:38:56PM +0100,
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:57:06PM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
> > Well, here never did until today :) With test9, I had left the box idle
>
> Just happened with test10, same circumstances .. font map got
> I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
> 2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
>
> What I do see occasionally is if X was ever heavy on the memory usage (say
> I've run GIMP for a couple of hours) then the text console's font set
that way.
Chris.
> -Original Message-
> From: M.H.VanLeeuwen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 12:44 AM
> To: CRADOCK, Christopher
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10
>
> "CRADOCK, C
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:57:06PM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
> Well, here never did until today :) With test9, I had left the box idle
Just happened with test10, same circumstances .. font map got corrupted, and
noise on the screen. Switching back and forth from X to a vc fixed
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:44:25PM -0600, M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote:
> "CRADOCK, Christopher" wrote:
> > I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
> > 2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
> >
> > What I do see occasionally is if X was ever
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:44:25PM -0600, M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote:
"CRADOCK, Christopher" wrote:
I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
What I do see occasionally is if X was ever heavy on the
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:57:06PM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
Well, here never did until today :) With test9, I had left the box idle
Just happened with test10, same circumstances .. font map got corrupted, and
noise on the screen. Switching back and forth from X to a vc fixed it,
that way.
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: M.H.VanLeeuwen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 12:44 AM
To: CRADOCK, Christopher
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10
"CRADOCK, Christopher" wrote:
I have
I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
What I do see occasionally is if X was ever heavy on the memory usage (say
I've run GIMP for a couple of hours) then the text console's font set gets
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:57:06PM +0100, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote:
Well, here never did until today :) With test9, I had left the box idle
Just happened with test10, same circumstances .. font map got
Hi!
> My list of 2.4.0-testX problems
>
> Problem description:
>
> 1. kernel compiled w/o FB support. When attempting to switch
> back to X from VC1-6 system locks hard for SMP. Nada thing
> fixes this except hard reset... no Alt-SysRq-B, nothing
> DRI not enabled.
Yes..long standing bug, and I don't have sufficient time to get my feet wet in the IDE
dept
and fix it.
-d
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
> > Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
>
> Yep, disabling (opposite of "enabling") does allow the kernel to boot just fine.
>
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
> > devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
> The ioctls of network devices are generally unsafe on SMP, because
> they run
"CRADOCK, Christopher" wrote:
>
> I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
> 2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
>
> What I do see occasionally is if X was ever heavy on the memory usage (say
> I've run GIMP for a couple of hours) then
David Ford wrote:
>
> "M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
>
> > 3. Enabling PIIX4, kernel locks hard when printing the partition
> >tables for hdc. hdc has no partitions.
> >I think this problem is on Ted's problem list???
>
> Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
> 3. Enabling PIIX4, kernel locks hard when printing the partition
>tables for hdc. hdc has no partitions.
>I think this problem is on Ted's problem list???
Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
-d
--
"The difference between
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:35:18AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> With the USB driver updates I've already seen, it looks like an
> upcoming 2.4 kernel may no longer need those driver scripts; not
> sure about the 2.2 backports though.
I think one of the "rules" is that the 2.2.x kernel
> linux-2.4.0-test10-pre7/drivers/usb/usb.c introduced a really
> cool feature, where USB drivers can declare a data structure that
> describes the various ID bytes of the USB devices that they are
> relevant to.
It's the same tool architecture used with PCI: modules.pci
Hello!
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
> > devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
What do you mean?
If I understood you correclty, this has been fixed in early 2.3
and never
until the next reboot. Console driver failing to reset something?
Chris Cradock
> -Original Message-
> From: M.H.VanLeeuwen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 6:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is
> > correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
> > update.
> >
> > Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
>
> Until we know what the preventium IV does
> for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is
> correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
> update.
>
> Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems
wisest to test for
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>But it contains an erroneous part in microcode.c:
>
>- if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c->x86 < 6){
>+ if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c->x86 != 6){
>printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d not an Intel P6\n",
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
> consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
Linus,
But it contains an erroneous part in microcode.c:
- if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c->x86 < 6){
+ if
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
> devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
The ioctls of network devices are generally unsafe on SMP, because
they run with kernel lock dropped now
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
The ioctls of network devices are generally unsafe on SMP, because
they run with kernel lock dropped now but
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
Linus,
But it contains an erroneous part in microcode.c:
- if (c-x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c-x86 6){
+ if
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
But it contains an erroneous part in microcode.c:
- if (c-x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c-x86 6){
+ if (c-x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || c-x86 != 6){
printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d not an Intel P6\n",
cpu_num);
for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for "" is
correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
update.
Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems
wisest to test for == not
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for "" is
correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode
update.
Perhaps Richard can clarify this?
Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode
until the next reboot. Console driver failing to reset something?
Chris Cradock
-Original Message-
From: M.H.VanLeeuwen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10
FYI
Hello!
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
What do you mean?
If I understood you correclty, this has been fixed in early 2.3
and never
linux-2.4.0-test10-pre7/drivers/usb/usb.c introduced a really
cool feature, where USB drivers can declare a data structure that
describes the various ID bytes of the USB devices that they are
relevant to.
It's the same tool architecture used with PCI: modules.pcimap
(and now
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:35:18AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
With the USB driver updates I've already seen, it looks like an
upcoming 2.4 kernel may no longer need those driver scripts; not
sure about the 2.2 backports though.
I think one of the "rules" is that the 2.2.x kernel shouldn't
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
3. Enabling PIIX4, kernel locks hard when printing the partition
tables for hdc. hdc has no partitions.
I think this problem is on Ted's problem list???
Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
-d
--
"The difference between
David Ford wrote:
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
3. Enabling PIIX4, kernel locks hard when printing the partition
tables for hdc. hdc has no partitions.
I think this problem is on Ted's problem list???
Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
Yep,
"CRADOCK, Christopher" wrote:
I have a similar hardware list and I don't observe any of these problems on
2.4.0-test10x. Is it possibly a hardware conflict somewhere?
What I do see occasionally is if X was ever heavy on the memory usage (say
I've run GIMP for a couple of hours) then the
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
What about the fact anyone can crash a box using ioctls on net
devices and waiting for an unload - was this fixed ?
The ioctls of network devices are generally unsafe on SMP, because
they run with
Yes..long standing bug, and I don't have sufficient time to get my feet wet in the IDE
dept
and fix it.
-d
"M.H.VanLeeuwen" wrote:
Disable PIIXn tuning and recompile your kernel. How does it fare now?
Yep, disabling (opposite of "enabling") does allow the kernel to boot just fine.
PIIXn
Hi!
My list of 2.4.0-testX problems
Problem description:
1. kernel compiled w/o FB support. When attempting to switch
back to X from VC1-6 system locks hard for SMP. Nada thing
fixes this except hard reset... no Alt-SysRq-B, nothing
DRI not enabled. Video card
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Miles Lane wrote:
>
> Were there no changes between test10-pre7 and test10?
> I notice you didn't send out a Changelist.
>
> The Changelists help me focus my testing.
Sorry. Here it is..
Linus
-
- final:
- Jeff Garzik: ISA network driver
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[snip]
> Naah, he mainly just does some browsing with netscape, and (don't tell a
> soul) plays QuakeIII with the door locked.
>
> Linus
Although he might find that 2.2.18pre18 gives better frame rates. :)
1024x768, Max detail,
Linus,
Were there no changes between test10-pre7 and test10?
I notice you didn't send out a Changelist.
The Changelists help me focus my testing.
Thanks,
Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI,
My list of 2.4.0-testX problems
Further details, .config, etc...available if needed
Martin
2.4.0-test10 and earlier problem list:
Problem | UP UP-APIC SMP
|
1 | OK OK
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> Does autofs4 work yet
Autofs4 was fixed in 2.4.0-test10-pre6 or so. Autofs4 for 2.2.x has
been working for some time, though I just updated the 2.2 patch so it
doesn't stomp on autofs (v3).
J
PGP signature
linux-2.4.0-test10-pre7/drivers/usb/usb.c introduced a really
cool feature, where USB drivers can declare a data structure that
describes the various ID bytes of the USB devices that they are
relevant to. Updated versions of depmod and hotplug are then
used so that the appropriate USB
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 12:41:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
> consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
Sure, it's not a critical bug or anything but hey. One more time:
This is a very minor patch for
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Less Critical:
> Does autofs4 work yet
has been apparently working fine for me for a while on 2.4test and
2.2+patch. (while==not noticed any major problems in last couple of
months)
> Alan
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP5 key:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that
> > I consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
> >
> > And when I don't know of a bug, it doesn't exist. Let us
> > rejoice. In
> Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
> consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
The fact power management even handling is completely broken and crashes
on unfortunately timed module unloads doesnt count ?
More importantly has the bug when you can use the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that
> I consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
>
> And when I don't know of a bug, it doesn't exist. Let us
> rejoice. In traditional kernel naming tradition, this kernel
> hereby
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
And when I don't know of a bug, it doesn't exist. Let us rejoice. In
traditional kernel naming tradition, this kernel hereby gets anointed as
one of the "greased weasel" kernel
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
And when I don't know of a bug, it doesn't exist. Let us rejoice. In
traditional kernel naming tradition, this kernel hereby gets anointed as
one of the "greased weasel" kernel
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that
I consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
And when I don't know of a bug, it doesn't exist. Let us
rejoice. In traditional kernel naming tradition, this kernel
hereby gets
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
The fact power management even handling is completely broken and crashes
on unfortunately timed module unloads doesnt count ?
More importantly has the bug when you can use the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that
I consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
And when I don't know of a bug, it doesn't exist. Let us
rejoice. In traditional
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
Less Critical:
Does autofs4 work yet
has been apparently working fine for me for a while on 2.4test and
2.2+patch. (while==not noticed any major problems in last couple of
months)
Alan
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP5 key:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 12:41:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, test10-final is out there now. This has no _known_ bugs that I
consider show-stoppers, for what it's worth.
Sure, it's not a critical bug or anything but hey. One more time:
This is a very minor patch for fs/nls/Config.in,
linux-2.4.0-test10-pre7/drivers/usb/usb.c introduced a really
cool feature, where USB drivers can declare a data structure that
describes the various ID bytes of the USB devices that they are
relevant to. Updated versions of depmod and hotplug are then
used so that the appropriate USB
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 08:55:13PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Does autofs4 work yet
Autofs4 was fixed in 2.4.0-test10-pre6 or so. Autofs4 for 2.2.x has
been working for some time, though I just updated the 2.2 patch so it
doesn't stomp on autofs (v3).
J
PGP signature
FYI,
My list of 2.4.0-testX problems
Further details, .config, etc...available if needed
Martin
2.4.0-test10 and earlier problem list:
Problem | UP UP-APIC SMP
|
1 | OK OK
Linus,
Were there no changes between test10-pre7 and test10?
I notice you didn't send out a Changelist.
The Changelists help me focus my testing.
Thanks,
Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[snip]
Naah, he mainly just does some browsing with netscape, and (don't tell a
soul) plays QuakeIII with the door locked.
Linus
Although he might find that 2.2.18pre18 gives better frame rates. :)
1024x768, Max detail, 32bit,
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Miles Lane wrote:
Were there no changes between test10-pre7 and test10?
I notice you didn't send out a Changelist.
The Changelists help me focus my testing.
Sorry. Here it is..
Linus
-
- final:
- Jeff Garzik: ISA network driver cleanup,
104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
--CUT HERE
diff --new-file -u -
104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
--CUT HERE
diff --new-file -u -
I understand you are in charge of this per MAINTAINERS, it not, I
apologize for bothering you.
Red Hat 7, i686, gcc-20001027 (from CVS) complains about '??)' trigraphs at
lines 1278 and 6367. Should that be just '(?)', or perhaps 'xx'? (egcs-1.1.2
keeps quiet).
[Yes, trigraphs are bletcherous.
I understand you are in charge of this per MAINTAINERS, it not, I
apologize for bothering you.
Red Hat 7, i686, gcc-20001027 (from CVS) complains about '??)' trigraphs at
lines 1278 and 6367. Should that be just '(?)', or perhaps 'xx'? (egcs-1.1.2
keeps quiet).
[Yes, trigraphs are bletcherous.
Sebastian Benoit wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
> System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
>
> 2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
> when running 'mount -o remount,rw /' during boot.
> It also
ash when booting linux-2.4.0-test10-pre5
>
> Hi,
>
> i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
> System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
>
> 2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
> when running 'mount -o
Hi,
i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
when running 'mount -o remount,rw /' during boot.
It also complains that /proc isn't mounted (it is
Hi,
i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
when running 'mount -o remount,rw /' during boot.
It also complains that /proc isn't mounted (it is
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 3:52 PM
Subject: crash when booting linux-2.4.0-test10-pre5
Hi,
i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and cra
Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Hi,
i have a PPro here with an AMI MegaRAID controller.
System is RedHat 7 + e2fsprogs-1.19, modutils-2.3.19, util-linux-2.10o
2.4.0-test10-pre5 is compiled with gcc 2.7.3.2 and and crashes
when running 'mount -o remount,rw /' during boot.
It also complains
PROTECTED]>
* SuSE Labs
--- /opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test10-pre1/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c Mon Sep 11 02:49:27
2000
+++ drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c Thu Oct 12 19:01:09 2000
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@
sr_cmd[7] = ti->cdti_trk1;
sr_cmd[8] = ti->cdti_ind1;
-
--- /opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-test10-pre1/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c Mon Sep 11 02:49:27
2000
+++ drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c Thu Oct 12 19:01:09 2000
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@
sr_cmd[7] = ti-cdti_trk1;
sr_cmd[8] = ti-cdti_ind1;
- result = sr_do_ioctl(target
I have adaptec 20160 scsi adapter and plextor 32x cdrom.
I played audio cd with gtcd(gnome app) and eject cdrom with gtcd(eject button)
, gtcd died and dmesg out...
--
kernel BUG at /usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test10/include/asm/pci.h:61!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[]
EFLAGS
I have adaptec 20160 scsi adapter and plextor 32x cdrom.
I played audio cd with gtcd(gnome app) and eject cdrom with gtcd(eject button)
, gtcd died and dmesg out...
--
kernel BUG at /usr/src/linux-2.4.0-test10/include/asm/pci.h:61!
invalid operand:
CPU:0
EIP:0010:[d1f2e6a4]
EFLAGS
90 matches
Mail list logo
