--- Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> are those MINIX_SUBPARITIONS in 2.4.2 actually
> supposed to copile?
> in fs/partitions/msdos.c it refers to some MINIX
> defines which do not
> seems to be included in that path.
Did not work for me either.
Michel
are those MINIX_SUBPARITIONS in 2.4.2 actually supposed to copile?
in fs/partitions/msdos.c it refers to some MINIX defines which do not
seems to be included in that path.
-
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/Linux/24/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2
are those MINIX_SUBPARITIONS in 2.4.2 actually supposed to copile?
in fs/partitions/msdos.c it refers to some MINIX defines which do not
seems to be included in that path.
-
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/Linux/24/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2
--- Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are those MINIX_SUBPARITIONS in 2.4.2 actually
supposed to copile?
in fs/partitions/msdos.c it refers to some MINIX
defines which do not
seems to be included in that path.
Did not work for me either.
Michel
4 matches
Mail list logo