RE: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-13 Thread Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\)
- Mensaje original - De: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enviado: martes, 12 de septiembre de 2000 17:38 Asunto: Linux 2.2.18pre6 > o Fix rtc race between timer and rtc irq (Andrea Arcangeli) > o Fix slow gettimeofday SMP race

RE: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-13 Thread Jorge Boncompte \(DTI2\)
- Mensaje original - De: "Alan Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado: martes, 12 de septiembre de 2000 17:38 Asunto: Linux 2.2.18pre6 o Fix rtc race between timer and rtc irq (Andrea Arcangeli) o Fix slow gettimeofday SMP race (Andrea Arcangeli) o Check

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-12 Thread Tom Leete
Alan Cox wrote: > [AH>>] > > larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? > > I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core > and picking the important and stable drivers first. On one machine, I have applied ide-2.2.17.all.2904.patch just to

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-12 Thread Alan Cox
> I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the > larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core and picking the important and stable drivers first. > I am considering the pull of

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-12 Thread Andre Hedrick
Alan, I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? The ali-driver is straight out of 2.4 or ide-patch with parts of cmd646 taken to actively tune the drive and chipsets. If it is the issue of the taskfile

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-12 Thread Andre Hedrick
Alan, I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? The ali-driver is straight out of 2.4 or ide-patch with parts of cmd646 taken to actively tune the drive and chipsets. If it is the issue of the taskfile

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-12 Thread Alan Cox
I see you parse-pieces for the 2.4 code as backports into 2.2 of the larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core and picking the important and stable drivers first. I am considering the pull of the

Re: Linux 2.2.18pre6

2000-09-12 Thread Tom Leete
Alan Cox wrote: [AH] larger ide-patch. What is it going to take to just accept it? I'd prefer to do it bit by bit, driver by driver without touching the core and picking the important and stable drivers first. On one machine, I have applied ide-2.2.17.all.2904.patch just to get the