Hi!
> > >Is read access safe ?
> >
> > Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
> > nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at least safe.
>
> Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the
> disk controller that
Hi!
Is read access safe ?
Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at least safe.
Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the
disk controller that cause data to
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Thank you for a reply, but I don't think it's just the ide stuff which
broken. ext2fs is also broken and I suspect that all the rest is broken too.
It looks like there was a single change which affected all the modules...
> Working to clean all the
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
> > and ext2fs
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
and ext2fs being also
Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
> and ext2fs being also modular. When trying to load them from initrd, I
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
Don't be silly. I do not use RedHat (I do my own distribution, KSI Linux)
and their mkinitrd is just a script. Furthermore, I don't have ext2fs in the
kernel so their mkinitrd won't work. I do not have ide in the kernel
either...
> As I don't use
As I don't use initrd at all I am a bit out of my depth here but according
to Documentation/Changes you need a new mkinitrd and the version suggested
seems to be 2.8-1. Checking my up-to-date RedHat 7.0 workstation it has
mkinitrd version 2.6-1, so this might be your problem?
Best regards,
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
and ext2fs being also modular. When trying to load them from initrd, I have
the following output:
=== Cut ===
ide-mod.o: Can't handle sections of type 32131
ide-probe-mod.o: Can't
> does that mean, if I apply ac11 I have already the same like pre9 patch
> plus you patches?
Yes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Alan
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> o Resync with Linus 2.4.1pre9
does that mean, if I apply ac11 I have already the same like pre9 patch
plus you patches?
I know, its not the most intelligent question, but nobody could tell me...
rgds
Luc de Louw
-
To unsubscribe from
At 17:03 24/01/01, Timur Tabi wrote:
>** Reply to message from Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Jan
>2001 16:54:36 +
>
> > >Is read access safe ?
> >
> > Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
> > nothing can happen to it in any way, your
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the
> disk controller that cause data to become overwritten, even when it's just
> supposed to read that data?
IMHO the NTFS driver creators weren't bloody newbies and won't do such
a bug, even not by
** Reply to message from Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 24 Jan
2001 16:54:36 +
> >Is read access safe ?
>
> Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
> nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at least safe.
Isn't it still
At 15:05 24/01/01, Cataldo Thomas wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 2.4.0-ac11
> > o Major NTFS updates (Anton Altaparmakov)
>
>Is read access safe ?
Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
nothing can happen to
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
> Slightly delayed because I had take some time out to fall off a horse..
>
>
> 2.4.0-ac11
> o Major NTFS updates (Anton Altaparmakov)
Is read access safe ?
I would
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Slightly delayed because I had take some time out to fall off a horse..
2.4.0-ac11
o Raid5 corruption fix(Neil Brown)
o Add Etrax 'cris' architecture support (Axis)
o APIC
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Slightly delayed because I had take some time out to fall off a horse..
2.4.0-ac11
o Raid5 corruption fix(Neil Brown)
o Add Etrax 'cris' architecture support (Axis)
o APIC
At 15:05 24/01/01, Cataldo Thomas wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
2.4.0-ac11
o Major NTFS updates (Anton Altaparmakov)
Is read access safe ?
Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
nothing can happen to it in
** Reply to message from Anton Altaparmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 24 Jan
2001 16:54:36 +
Is read access safe ?
Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at least safe.
Isn't it still
Timur Tabi wrote:
Isn't it still theoretcially possible for the driver to send commands to the
disk controller that cause data to become overwritten, even when it's just
supposed to read that data?
IMHO the NTFS driver creators weren't bloody newbies and won't do such
a bug, even not by
At 17:03 24/01/01, Timur Tabi wrote:
** Reply to message from Anton Altaparmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 24 Jan
2001 16:54:36 +
Is read access safe ?
Of course read-only is safe. As long as you mount the partition READ-ONLY
nothing can happen to it in any way, your NTFS data is at
does that mean, if I apply ac11 I have already the same like pre9 patch
plus you patches?
Yes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
and ext2fs being also modular. When trying to load them from initrd, I have
the following output:
=== Cut ===
ide-mod.o: Can't handle sections of type 32131
ide-probe-mod.o: Can't
As I don't use initrd at all I am a bit out of my depth here but according
to Documentation/Changes you need a new mkinitrd and the version suggested
seems to be 2.8-1. Checking my up-to-date RedHat 7.0 workstation it has
mkinitrd version 2.6-1, so this might be your problem?
Best regards,
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
Don't be silly. I do not use RedHat (I do my own distribution, KSI Linux)
and their mkinitrd is just a script. Furthermore, I don't have ext2fs in the
kernel so their mkinitrd won't work. I do not have ide in the kernel
either...
As I don't use
Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
and ext2fs being also modular. When trying to load them from initrd, I have
27 matches
Mail list logo
