Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-24 Thread Thomas Dodd
David Weinehall wrote: > > We don't provide the binutils or gcc with the kernel either. The 6502 > > is a rather well known processor. Try plonking "6502 assembler" in > > google and you'll have a lot of choice. > > Me likee, finally asm in the kernel I can grok. Someone else who has trouble

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-24 Thread Thomas Dodd
David Weinehall wrote: We don't provide the binutils or gcc with the kernel either. The 6502 is a rather well known processor. Try plonking 6502 assembler in google and you'll have a lot of choice. Me likee, finally asm in the kernel I can grok. Someone else who has trouble with x86

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2001 05:36:20 -0400, > Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > >> What is the point of including it in the kernel source tree without the > >> code to convert it to

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread David Weinehall
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:36:20AM -0400, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > > On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:17:08 +0200 (CEST), > > Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > > >> Is

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 23 May 2001 05:36:20 -0400, Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: >> What is the point of including it in the kernel source tree without the >> code to convert it to ser_a2232fw.h? Nobody can use ser_a2232fw.ax, it >>

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Olivier Galibert
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:17:08 +0200 (CEST), > Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > >> Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. > > > >It's the

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:17:08 +0200 (CEST), Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: >> Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. > >It's the source for the firmware hexdump in ser_a2232fw.h, provided as a >reference.

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: > Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. It's the source for the firmware hexdump in ser_a2232fw.h, provided as a reference. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. It's the source for the firmware hexdump in ser_a2232fw.h, provided as a reference. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Olivier Galibert
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:17:08 +0200 (CEST), Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. It's the source for the

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 23 May 2001 05:36:20 -0400, Olivier Galibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: What is the point of including it in the kernel source tree without the code to convert it to ser_a2232fw.h? Nobody can use ser_a2232fw.ax, it is just

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread David Weinehall
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:36:20AM -0400, Olivier Galibert wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001 09:17:08 +0200 (CEST), Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-23 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Keith Owens wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001 05:36:20 -0400, Olivier Galibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:07:38PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: What is the point of including it in the kernel source tree without the code to convert it to ser_a2232fw.h?

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-22 Thread Keith Owens
Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-22 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org Rather than starting to propogate these fixes to other drivers I'd be greatful if they would audit the changes (especially the

Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-22 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org Rather than starting to propogate these fixes to other drivers I'd be greatful if they would audit the changes (especially the

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac14

2001-05-22 Thread Keith Owens
Is drivers/char/ser_a2232fw.ax supposed to be included? Nothing uses it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at