Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-10 Thread Avuton Olrich
On 6/4/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. (CCd net device MAINTAINERs, I'm not sure, but nv_alloc_rx is forcedeth) This server has been up for about a day now and I'm starting to get some bad looking

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-10 Thread Avuton Olrich
On 6/4/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. (CCd net device MAINTAINERs, I'm not sure, but nv_alloc_rx is forcedeth) This server has been up for about a day now and I'm starting to get some bad looking messages

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Don't know Jan. nv, the last time I tried that bucket of molasses in > january, > couldn't drive this card at more than 800x600, and I am used to double that > both ways. > > The last time I booted to nv, it took me a week to get all the crap fixed > that > it overwrote trying to fit

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >On Jun 7 2007 12:06, Gene Heskett wrote: >>On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>>On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> It is too stable for me. >> >>I wish all our testers were you ;) > >It [2.6.22-rc4] did

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jun 7 2007 12:06, Gene Heskett wrote: > >On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: >> It is too stable for me. > >I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: > It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) >>> >>>It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel >>>(same config but without fc patches). >> >>Oh its

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: It is too stable for me. >>> >>>I wish all our testers were you ;) >> >>It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel >>(same config but without fc patches). >> >Oh its stable allright, but why do I have to turn the monitor

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >On Jun 5 2007 12:26, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >>> It is too stable for me. >> >>I wish all our testers were you ;) > >It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel >(same config

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jun 5 2007 12:26, Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> >> It is too stable for me. > >I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel (same config but without fc patches). Jan -- - To

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jun 5 2007 12:26, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel (same config but without fc patches). Jan -- - To

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jun 5 2007 12:26, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel (same config but without fc

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel (same config but without fc patches). Oh its stable allright, but why do I have to turn the monitor off by hand when I

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel (same config but without fc patches). Oh its stable allright, but why do I

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jun 7 2007 12:06, Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that stock FC7 kernel (same config but without fc

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jun 7 2007 12:06, Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday 07 June 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jun 7 2007 11:24, Gene Heskett wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) It [2.6.22-rc4] did not die on me so far, unlike that

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Don't know Jan. nv, the last time I tried that bucket of molasses in january, couldn't drive this card at more than 800x600, and I am used to double that both ways. The last time I booted to nv, it took me a week to get all the crap fixed that it overwrote trying to fit the

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-06 Thread Mikael Pettersson
I'm just guessing here, but maybe pdc_interrupt()'s clearing of PDC_INT_SEQMASK also affects whatever legacy ATA status bit libata is polling to detect completion of the qc? --- linux-2.6.22-rc4/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~ 2007-06-05 22:21:39.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4/drivers/ata/

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-06 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: >> I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no >> sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata >> polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes >>

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-06 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Jeff Garzik wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes sata_promise

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-06 Thread Mikael Pettersson
of the qc? --- linux-2.6.22-rc4/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~ 2007-06-05 22:21:39.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc4/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c 2007-06-06 12:04:38.0 +0200 @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap-active_tag

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread walt
Jeff Garzik wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes sata_promise work

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 5 June 2007 22:19, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ > > > > 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] > > > > Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at > > > > /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2414

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no > sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata > polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes > sata_promise work again for me.

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:14:46 +0100, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[Tejun, Jeff, added you since the bisect points to your patch.] > >Sorry, mail glitch means I lost a couple of emails... > >I said: >Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise >detection... >

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Badari Pulavarty
arning: `__kfree_section_memmap' defined but not used Here is the patch. Thanks, Badari __kmalloc_section_memmap(), vaddr_in_vmalloc_area() and __kfree_section_memmap() are used only for MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Moved them under CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-2

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ > > > 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] > > > Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at > > > /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2414 check_flags() > > > > [ 116.755052] irq event stamp: 69 > > > [

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > isnt the refrigerator() suspend related? Perhaps suspend disables irqs > > somewhere that we forgot to track? > > There _is_ something strange there. For that whole sequence to trigger, > the current task has to have the TIF_FREEZE bit set, but I don't see why > it would be during

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > isnt the refrigerator() suspend related? Perhaps suspend disables irqs > somewhere that we forgot to track? There _is_ something strange there. For that whole sequence to trigger, the current task has to have the TIF_FREEZE bit set, but I don't see

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this looks harmless > > > > [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ > > 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] > > Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at > > /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2414

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) > this looks harmless > > [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' > [ 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created > [ 116.745353] Stopping tasks ... WARNING:

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Linus Torvalds pisze: So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. It is too stable for me. aio_dio_bugs ok aiostress ok bash_shared_mapping ok cpu_hotplug ok fio ok fsx ok interbench ok iozone ok isic ok linus_stress ok the latest ltp ok this looks harmless

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread David Greaves
Linus Torvalds wrote: > So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. > I'd ask that people involved with the known regressions please test > whether they got fixed, and if you wrote a patch and it's still pending, > please make sure to push it upstream.. [Tejun,

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:29:43 +0100, David Greaves wrote: > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > [Linus' 2.6.22-rc4 announcement] > > > > Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise > > detection... :( > >

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:29:43 +0100, David Greaves wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > [Linus' 2.6.22-rc4 announcement] > > Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise > detection... :( Please give us some details about your sata_promise problem: - describe your hardware

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread David Greaves
Linus Torvalds wrote: > So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. > > The diffstat (for those that look at those kinds of things) tells the > story: lots of small stuff to random files. I think the single biggest > file change was the patch-checking script,

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread David Greaves
Linus Torvalds wrote: So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. The diffstat (for those that look at those kinds of things) tells the story: lots of small stuff to random files. I think the single biggest file change was the patch-checking script, along

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:29:43 +0100, David Greaves wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: [Linus' 2.6.22-rc4 announcement] Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise detection... :( Please give us some details about your sata_promise problem: - describe your hardware

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:29:43 +0100, David Greaves wrote: Linus Torvalds wrote: [Linus' 2.6.22-rc4 announcement] Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise detection... :( Please give us

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread David Greaves
Linus Torvalds wrote: So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. I'd ask that people involved with the known regressions please test whether they got fixed, and if you wrote a patch and it's still pending, please make sure to push it upstream.. [Tejun,

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Linus Torvalds pisze: So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further. It is too stable for me. aio_dio_bugs ok aiostress ok bash_shared_mapping ok cpu_hotplug ok fio ok fsx ok interbench ok iozone ok isic ok linus_stress ok the latest ltp ok this looks harmless

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: It is too stable for me. I wish all our testers were you ;) this looks harmless [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this looks harmless [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2414 check_flags() [

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: isnt the refrigerator() suspend related? Perhaps suspend disables irqs somewhere that we forgot to track? There _is_ something strange there. For that whole sequence to trigger, the current task has to have the TIF_FREEZE bit set, but I don't see why

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! isnt the refrigerator() suspend related? Perhaps suspend disables irqs somewhere that we forgot to track? There _is_ something strange there. For that whole sequence to trigger, the current task has to have the TIF_FREEZE bit set, but I don't see why it would be during shutdown.

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2414 check_flags() [ 116.755052] irq event stamp: 69 [ 116.755060] hardirqs

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Badari Pulavarty
' defined but not used Here is the patch. Thanks, Badari __kmalloc_section_memmap(), vaddr_in_vmalloc_area() and __kfree_section_memmap() are used only for MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Moved them under CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Signed-off-by: Badari Pulavarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/mm

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes sata_promise work again for me. Ugh.

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 5 June 2007 22:19, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! [ 116.733327] PM: suspend-to-disk mode set to 'shutdown' [ 116.738849] swsusp: Basic memory bitmaps created [ 116.745353] Stopping tasks ... WARNING: at /home/devel/linux-git/kernel/lockdep.c:2414 check_flags() [

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:14:46 +0100, David Greaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Tejun, Jeff, added you since the bisect points to your patch.] Sorry, mail glitch means I lost a couple of emails... I said: Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise detection... It turns

Re: Linux 2.6.22-rc4 - sata_promise regression since -rc3

2007-06-05 Thread walt
Jeff Garzik wrote: On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes sata_promise work

Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
[POWERPC] Fix Section mismatch warnings NET: add MAINTAINERS entry for ucc_geth driver Linus Torvalds (2): smpboot: fix cachesize comparison in smp_tune_scheduling() Linux 2.6.22-rc4 Luis R. Rodriguez (1): prism54: MAINTAINERS update Maciej W. Rozycki (2): defxx:

Linux 2.6.22-rc4

2007-06-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
): [POWERPC] Fix Section mismatch warnings NET: add MAINTAINERS entry for ucc_geth driver Linus Torvalds (2): smpboot: fix cachesize comparison in smp_tune_scheduling() Linux 2.6.22-rc4 Luis R. Rodriguez (1): prism54: MAINTAINERS update Maciej W. Rozycki (2): defxx