On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:56:09AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andrew, hi Chritoph,
>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:38:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
> > Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
Hi Andrew, hi Chritoph,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:38:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > > : undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
> >
> >
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
>>>
>>> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
>>> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
>>>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
>>
>> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
>> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
>> CHK include/linux/compile.h
>>
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
GEN .version
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK
Hi Andrew, hi Chritoph,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:38:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
: undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
There is also a
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:56:09AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Andrew, hi Chritoph,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:38:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
>
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> GEN .version
> CHK
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> sounds like a bad idea; a compile time failure is of course nicer than
> a runtime failure for the cases we can find the bug at compile-time already.
>
There is not much chance of a runtime failure these days since kmalloc now
supports up to 4MB
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We could replace the __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() with a BUG()
> statement so we have the same effect in SLAB?
>
sounds like a bad idea; a compile time failure is of course nicer than
a runtime failure
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > : undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
>
> There is also a kernel.org bugzilla for this at
>
>
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > : undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
There is also a kernel.org bugzilla for this at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9669
For some reason my adds to this do not show up.
In both cases we have a
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
>
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> GEN .version
> CHK
Hi,
The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD
Hi,
The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
UPD include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
GEN .version
CHK
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
: undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
There is also a kernel.org bugzilla for this at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9669
For some reason my adds to this do not show up.
In both cases we have a
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
: undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'
There is also a kernel.org bugzilla for this at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9669
For
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could replace the __you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much() with a BUG()
statement so we have the same effect in SLAB?
sounds like a bad idea; a compile time failure is of course nicer than
a runtime failure for
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
sounds like a bad idea; a compile time failure is of course nicer than
a runtime failure for the cases we can find the bug at compile-time already.
There is not much chance of a runtime failure these days since kmalloc now
supports up to 4MB
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:06:20 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
The defconfig make fails on x86_64 (AMD box) with following error
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
GEN .version
CHK include/linux/compile.h
22 matches
Mail list logo
