On 04/16/2018 12:34 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
>> trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
>
> .. and I also verified that
On 04/16/2018 12:34 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
>> trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
>
> .. and I also verified that it actually fixes the problem
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds to
> > go, but I guess I don't even need it.
>
> Ingo/Thomas: I will be
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds to
> > go, but I guess I don't even need it.
>
> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
> trivial and obvious
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
> trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
.. and I also verified that it actually fixes the problem Shuah
reported. Not that
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
> trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
.. and I also verified that it actually fixes the problem Shuah
reported. Not that there really was any question
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds to
> go, but I guess I don't even need it.
Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
trivial and obvious and I got
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds to
> go, but I guess I don't even need it.
Ingo/Thomas: I will be just taking this directly, since it's so
trivial and obvious and I got cc'd on the discussion.
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 18:55:38 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> End result: we actually removed more lines than we added:
>
> 13538 files changed, 627723 insertions(+), 818855 deletions(-)
>
> which is probably a first. Ever. In the history of the universe. Or at
>
On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 18:55:38 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> End result: we actually removed more lines than we added:
>
> 13538 files changed, 627723 insertions(+), 818855 deletions(-)
>
> which is probably a first. Ever. In the history of the universe. Or at
> least kernel releases.
For the
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Dave Hansen
wrote:
>
> Joerg just found and fixed something that would be poked by the x86
> selftests:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/16/230
Yup.
And that silly bug explains the all-ones PTE.
I was going through the bisection,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Dave Hansen
wrote:
>
> Joerg just found and fixed something that would be poked by the x86
> selftests:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/16/230
Yup.
And that silly bug explains the all-ones PTE.
I was going through the bisection, with just a couple more rounds
On 04/16/2018 10:56 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see *why* it would be badly set up, and that test works fine
>> for me, though.
>
> AHHAH!
>
> I'm wrong. I can see it too. My desktop was
On 04/16/2018 10:56 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see *why* it would be badly set up, and that test works fine
>> for me, though.
>
> AHHAH!
>
> I'm wrong. I can see it too. My desktop was running 18b7fd1c93e5 (my
> kernel
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I don't see *why* it would be badly set up, and that test works fine
> for me, though.
AHHAH!
I'm wrong. I can see it too. My desktop was running 18b7fd1c93e5 (my
kernel from Saturday, I hadn't rebooted
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> I don't see *why* it would be badly set up, and that test works fine
> for me, though.
AHHAH!
I'm wrong. I can see it too. My desktop was running 18b7fd1c93e5 (my
kernel from Saturday, I hadn't rebooted it since), but I had 4.17-rc1
in
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> [ 884.496588] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fe810030
This is the LDT remap area.
> [ 884.496614] Oops: 0009 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
This is RSVD + P, so it's a system read access that got a
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> [ 884.496588] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fe810030
This is the LDT remap area.
> [ 884.496614] Oops: 0009 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
This is RSVD + P, so it's a system read access that got a protection
fault due to
Andy/Ingo,
While running test_vsyscall_64 and fsgsbase_64 tests, I am seeing
the following errors in dmesg.
Also these tests either take forever to run or hang. I killed it after
waiting for an hour or so. Unfortunately it makes the kselftest suite
pain to run. Could you please take a look and
Andy/Ingo,
While running test_vsyscall_64 and fsgsbase_64 tests, I am seeing
the following errors in dmesg.
Also these tests either take forever to run or hang. I killed it after
waiting for an hour or so. Unfortunately it makes the kselftest suite
pain to run. Could you please take a look and
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:01:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > We actually have a fair amount of other removal and cleanups too. I
> > was somewhat pleasantly surprised by the number of pull
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:01:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > We actually have a fair amount of other removal and cleanups too. I
> > was somewhat pleasantly surprised by the number of pull requests that
> > actually ended up
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> We actually have a fair amount of other removal and cleanups too. I
> was somewhat pleasantly surprised by the number of pull requests that
> actually ended up removing a lot of lines. Some of it was staging
>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:55 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> We actually have a fair amount of other removal and cleanups too. I
> was somewhat pleasantly surprised by the number of pull requests that
> actually ended up removing a lot of lines. Some of it was staging
> drivers that finally gave up
So two weeks have passed, and the merge window was pretty normal and
is now closed.
This does not seem to be shaping up to be a particularly big release,
and there seems to be nothing particularly special about it. The most
special thing that happened is purely numerology: we've passed the six
So two weeks have passed, and the merge window was pretty normal and
is now closed.
This does not seem to be shaping up to be a particularly big release,
and there seems to be nothing particularly special about it. The most
special thing that happened is purely numerology: we've passed the six
26 matches
Mail list logo