Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
>
>>1. pseudo files or "" files
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> disabled. It remains a point of (extraordinary) contention as to
>>whether it can be fixed, we want to keep the code around until we can
>>devote proper resources into proving it can be (or until we fail to pr
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Do I remember right that the submission
> deadline is a week from Monday for 2.6.14 inclusion?
Next week, supposedly.
But something like a brand new filesystem can go in pretty much any time,
as long as it compiles. Because it can't break anyone
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 6. remove type safe lists and type safe hash queues.
>
>> not done, it is not clear that the person asking for this represents a
>> unified consensus of lkml. Other persons instead asked that it just be
>> moved out of reiser4 code into the generic kernel code, whic
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:42:19PM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> >
> >>If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch
> >>in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substant
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> >
> >>If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch
> >>in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in coding
> >>hours
On 9/9/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >
> >
> >>If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch
> >>in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in codin
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch
>>in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in coding
>>hours) task, and it is done. Do I remember right that the
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:57:40PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> A very annoying small thing that comes to mind is the usage of
> reiser4_internal. Please remove it, all but exported symbol are
> module-private.
Oh, one other things that's totally annoying and makes reading the
code a pain ar
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> 1. pseudo files or "" files
>
>disabled. It remains a point of (extraordinary) contention as to whether
> it can be fixed, we want to keep the code around until we can devote proper
> resources into proving it can be (or unt
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:36:06AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> If we lose every remaining point of this list, we can generate a patch
> in a few days, because the VFS work was the only substantive (in coding
> hours) task, and it is done. Do I remember right that the submission
> deadline is a wee
We haven't been sending much email out, but we have been working away.
We just finished the VFS work, and will send a patch out on Monday.
akpm asked for a bullet list of things suggested on lkml as issues for
inclusion.
There are some things that I would like akpm to confirm represent the
off
11 matches
Mail list logo
