On Thursday, September 20, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:22 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Eeek, that sounds scary. Can you add "highres=off" as well ?
> >
> > FWIW I just tried your linux-2.6-hires tree with the attached
> > config and still see the problem. It
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:22 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Eeek, that sounds scary. Can you add "highres=off" as well ?
>
> FWIW I just tried your linux-2.6-hires tree with the attached config and
> still see the problem. It doesn't look like NO_HZ is even an option in
> that tree...
Right,
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:22 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Eeek, that sounds scary. Can you add highres=off as well ?
FWIW I just tried your linux-2.6-hires tree with the attached config and
still see the problem. It doesn't look like NO_HZ is even an option in
that tree...
Right, that's a
On Thursday, September 20, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 12:22 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Eeek, that sounds scary. Can you add highres=off as well ?
FWIW I just tried your linux-2.6-hires tree with the attached
config and still see the problem. It doesn't look like
On Monday, September 17, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
> > >
> > > nohz=off
> > >
> > > on the kernel command line ?
>
On Thursday, September 13, 2007, Chris Snook wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than
> > 50% of my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers
> > patch. Stock 2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel
> > from rawhide
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
>
> nohz=off
>
> on the kernel command line ?
Yeah, that makes a difference: the box hangs when I start receiving
vblank interrupts instead. However it's not a hard hang, I think
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
> >
> > nohz=off
> >
> > on the kernel command line ?
>
> Yeah, that makes a difference: the box hangs when I start
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
nohz=off
on the kernel command line ?
Yeah, that makes a difference: the box hangs when I start receiving
vblank
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
nohz=off
on the kernel command line ?
Yeah, that makes a difference: the box hangs when I start receiving
vblank interrupts instead. However it's not a hard hang, I think X
On Thursday, September 13, 2007, Chris Snook wrote:
Jesse Barnes wrote:
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than
50% of my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers
patch. Stock 2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel
from rawhide drops
On Monday, September 17, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
nohz=off
on the kernel command line ?
Yeah, that makes
On 09/12/2007 12:29 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/interrupts
>CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 290050 289541 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 3862 3956 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc0
> 9:
On 09/12/2007 12:29 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 290050 289541 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 3862 3956 IO-APIC-edge i8042
8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc0
9: 1632
Jesse Barnes wrote:
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than 50% of
my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers patch. Stock
2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel from rawhide drops
most of my interrupts unless I also have another interrupt
Jesse Barnes wrote:
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than 50% of
my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers patch. Stock
2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel from rawhide drops
most of my interrupts unless I also have another interrupt
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:29 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:33:15 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than
> > > 50% of my vblank interrupts to what seems to be
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:33:15 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than
> > 50% of my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers
> > patch. Stock 2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:33:15 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than 50% of
> my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers patch. Stock
> 2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel from rawhide drops
> most of my
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than 50% of
my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers patch. Stock
2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel from rawhide drops
most of my interrupts unless I also have another interrupt source
running (e.g.
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than 50% of
my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers patch. Stock
2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest (171) kernel from rawhide drops
most of my interrupts unless I also have another interrupt source
running (e.g.
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:33:15 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote:
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than
50% of my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires timers
patch. Stock 2.6.23-rc5 works fine, but the latest
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 09:29 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:33:15 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote:
I just narrowed down a weird problem where I was losing more than
50% of my vblank interrupts to what seems to be the hires
23 matches
Mail list logo
