On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:53:53PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git#tip-ras
>
> Latest experiments show that sometimes checking kventd_up() before calling
>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:18:45PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
> I see a different panic with this kernel. Not seen every time.
> It was after reboot due to injected errors.
Yeah, we did debug a bit last night with Tony - this is all in the
workqueue code which we're apparently calling too early into.
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:41:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> And I was waiting in line to get a chance to do some injection on our
>> EINJ box here too. But it seems you have the required setup already so
>> if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
>>
>>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:18:45PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
I see a different panic with this kernel. Not seen every time.
It was after reboot due to injected errors.
Yeah, we did debug a bit last night with Tony - this is all in the
workqueue code which we're apparently calling too early into. I
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:53:53PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git#tip-ras
Latest experiments show that sometimes checking kventd_up() before calling
schedule_work()
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:41:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
And I was waiting in line to get a chance to do some injection on our
EINJ box here too. But it seems you have the required setup already so
if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
> if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git#tip-ras
Latest experiments show that sometimes checking kventd_up() before calling
schedule_work()
helps ... but mostly only when I fake some early logs from low
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:41:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> And I was waiting in line to get a chance to do some injection on our
> EINJ box here too. But it seems you have the required setup already so
> if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
>
>
Hi Rui,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:04:56AM +, Wang, Rui Y wrote:
> Is it a known problem? I'm based on Linux 4.1.0-rc3-7.
Yeah, I triggered a similar thing in conjunction with testing Gong's
stuff:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611082747.ga30...@pd.tnic
And I was waiting in line to get a
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:41:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
And I was waiting in line to get a chance to do some injection on our
EINJ box here too. But it seems you have the required setup already so
if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
if you want to give those changes a run, I've uploaded them here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git#tip-ras
Latest experiments show that sometimes checking kventd_up() before calling
schedule_work()
helps ... but mostly only when I fake some early logs from low
Hi Rui,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:04:56AM +, Wang, Rui Y wrote:
Is it a known problem? I'm based on Linux 4.1.0-rc3-7.
Yeah, I triggered a similar thing in conjunction with testing Gong's
stuff:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611082747.ga30...@pd.tnic
And I was waiting in line to get a
Hi Boris & Tony,
While injecting MCEs using einj, I encountered a panic:
[0.305697] mce: CPU supports 22 MCE banks
[0.310288] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0100
[0.319057] IP: []
Hi Boris Tony,
While injecting MCEs using einj, I encountered a panic:
[0.305697] mce: CPU supports 22 MCE banks
[0.310288] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0100
[0.319057] IP:
14 matches
Mail list logo
