Re: MIPS: CONFIG_MIPS_R6?

2015-02-16 Thread Paul Bolle
Leonid, On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 17:22 -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > On 02/14/2015 09:21 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Your commits 430857eae56c ("MIPS: mm: Add MIPS R6 instruction > > encodings") and 90163242784b ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for > > the MIPS R6") are included in yesterday's

Re: MIPS: CONFIG_MIPS_R6?

2015-02-16 Thread Paul Bolle
Leonid, On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 17:22 -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: On 02/14/2015 09:21 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: Your commits 430857eae56c (MIPS: mm: Add MIPS R6 instruction encodings) and 90163242784b (MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6) are included in yesterday's linux-next

Re: MIPS: CONFIG_MIPS_R6?

2015-02-14 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
On 02/14/2015 09:21 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: Your commits 430857eae56c ("MIPS: mm: Add MIPS R6 instruction encodings") and 90163242784b ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6") are included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213). I noticed because a script I use to check

MIPS: CONFIG_MIPS_R6?

2015-02-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Your commits 430857eae56c ("MIPS: mm: Add MIPS R6 instruction encodings") and 90163242784b ("MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6") are included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213). I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it. These

MIPS: CONFIG_MIPS_R6?

2015-02-14 Thread Paul Bolle
Your commits 430857eae56c (MIPS: mm: Add MIPS R6 instruction encodings) and 90163242784b (MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6) are included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213). I noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it. These commits

Re: MIPS: CONFIG_MIPS_R6?

2015-02-14 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
On 02/14/2015 09:21 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: Your commits 430857eae56c (MIPS: mm: Add MIPS R6 instruction encodings) and 90163242784b (MIPS: kernel: unaligned: Add support for the MIPS R6) are included in yesterday's linux-next (ie, next-20150213). I noticed because a script I use to check