On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> I'll wait for 2.5 then...
> Where's that namespace patch located?
The last one I've put on anonftp was against 2.4.6-pre2 (namespaces-a-S6-pre2,
on ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro). It still includes tons of fs/super.c cleanups
and fixes - they still
From: "Alexander Viro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[snip]
>
> I didn't go for proper solution in 2.4.0-test*). However, instead of
> crufting up kinda-sorta namespaces one could use the real thing. Relevant
> cleanups of superblock handling will go in in 2.5.very_early and the
> rest of patch
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
> I was thinking of doing a chrooted login for some ssh accounts.
> The plan is this:
[snip CLONE_NAMESPACE-by-hands]
> Does this seem like a bad idea?
> (then please tell me why :))
Mostly because there's a better way to do that. Yes, such
I was thinking of doing a chrooted login for some ssh accounts.
The plan is this:
put stuff in
/home/u_dev
/home/u_etc
/home/u_bin
Then at login time mount them to
/home/user/dev
/home/user/etc
/home/user/bin
as readonly
chroot to /home/user
...
And then unmount them at logout time.
Does
I was thinking of doing a chrooted login for some ssh accounts.
The plan is this:
put stuff in
/home/u_dev
/home/u_etc
/home/u_bin
Then at login time mount them to
/home/user/dev
/home/user/etc
/home/user/bin
as readonly
chroot to /home/user
...
And then unmount them at logout time.
Does
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
I was thinking of doing a chrooted login for some ssh accounts.
The plan is this:
[snip CLONE_NAMESPACE-by-hands]
Does this seem like a bad idea?
(then please tell me why :))
Mostly because there's a better way to do that. Yes, such scheme
From: Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
I didn't go for proper solution in 2.4.0-test*). However, instead of
crufting up kinda-sorta namespaces one could use the real thing. Relevant
cleanups of superblock handling will go in in 2.5.very_early and the
rest of patch (namespace proper)
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Magnus Naeslund(f) wrote:
I'll wait for 2.5 then...
Where's that namespace patch located?
The last one I've put on anonftp was against 2.4.6-pre2 (namespaces-a-S6-pre2,
on ftp.math.psu.edu/pub/viro). It still includes tons of fs/super.c cleanups
and fixes - they still
8 matches
Mail list logo
