Hi Yanmin,
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because
> > > object=c->freelist=NULL.
> >
> > H. freelist should never be NULL. Could you rerun the test and boot with
> > slub_debug to make sure that there is no
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
> > On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing.
> > See
> > below log.
> >
>
> > Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because object=c->freelist=NULL.
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 08:52 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:59:18 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 "Zhang, Yanmin"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
> > > [] ?
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:59:18 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 "Zhang, Yanmin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Call Trace:
> > [] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
> > [] ? sock_alloc_send_skb+0x77/0x1d2
> > [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 "Zhang, Yanmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Call Trace:
> [] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
> [] ? sock_alloc_send_skb+0x77/0x1d2
> [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
> [] ? memcpy_fromiovec+0x36/0x66
> [] ? unix_stream_sendmsg+0x165/0x333
> [] ?
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 Zhang, Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call Trace:
[805e0024] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
[805dc389] ? sock_alloc_send_skb+0x77/0x1d2
[80243897] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[805e12d5] ? memcpy_fromiovec+0x36/0x66
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:59:18 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 Zhang, Yanmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call Trace:
[805e0024] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
[805dc389] ? sock_alloc_send_skb+0x77/0x1d2
[80243897] ?
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 08:52 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:59:18 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:01 +0800 Zhang, Yanmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call Trace:
[805e0024] ? __alloc_skb+0x31/0x121
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing.
See
below log.
Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because object=c-freelist=NULL.
H.
Hi Yanmin,
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 08:42 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because
object=c-freelist=NULL.
H. freelist should never be NULL. Could you rerun the test and boot with
slub_debug to make sure that there is no memory corruption?
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing. See
> below log.
>
> Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because object=c->freelist=NULL.
H. freelist should never be NULL. Could you rerun the test and boot with
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing. See
below log.
Kernel panic at line 1637 in file mm/slub.c because object=c-freelist=NULL.
H. freelist should never be NULL. Could you rerun the test and boot with
On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing. See
below log.
Commandline to start hackbench:
#./hackbench 150 process 2000
Kernel config options:
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
Kernel panic at line 1637 in
On my 16-core tigerton, kernel panic when I ran hackbench process testing. See
below log.
Commandline to start hackbench:
#./hackbench 150 process 2000
Kernel config options:
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
Kernel panic at line 1637 in
14 matches
Mail list logo
