Re: Navigational corrections

On 10/6/20 12:08 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 2020-10-03 13:39, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> Hi Alex, > [...] >> >> off_t would be great. >> >> In case you are looking for some other candidates, some others >> that I would be interested to see go into the page would

Re: Navigational corrections

Hi Michael, On 2020-10-03 13:39, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: Hi Alex, [...] off_t would be great. In case you are looking for some other candidates, some others that I would be interested to see go into the page would be fd_set clock_t clockid_t and probably dev_t Great! off_t is

Re: Navigational corrections

Hi Alex, > > > > The question of 'void *' is an interesting one. It is something > > like a fundamental C type, and not something that comes from POSIX. > > But, it does appear in POSIX APIs and often details of using > > the type are not well understood. So, as a matter of practicality, >

Re: Navigational corrections

Hi Michael, On 2020-10-03 10:00, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Alex, et al. > On 10/2/20 3:51 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> On 2020-10-02 15:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 14:20, Alejandro Colomar wrote: On 2020-10-02

Navigational corrections (was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] system_data_types.7: Add 'void *')

Hi Alex, et al. On 10/2/20 3:51 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > Hi Jonathan, > > On 2020-10-02 15:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 14:20, Alejandro Colomar >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2020-10-02 15:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 12:31, Michael