Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 18:14:24 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I may get some time to work on this topic, but what do you mean by kill
it ?
It means removing all of the "RFC1122 Status" comments from net/ipv4/*.c
Is it the removal of RFC 1122 evaluation in modules'
"David S. Miller" a écrit :
>
>Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:58:55 +0100
>From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>> I agree, I'll kill it unless you want to commit to this work
>> Andi. :-)
>
>Kill it ;)
>
> D
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:58:55 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> I agree, I'll kill it unless you want to commit to this work
> Andi. :-)
Kill it ;)
Done.
Seriously, if someone wants to do this work
> That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but
> -test12pre works too) is applied...
> +# MANPATH specifies where to install the manpages created from
> +# inline documentation
> +#
> +
> +MANDIR := /usr/share/man
> +
End user installed so
/usr/local/m
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> That could even be automated when this little patch (against -test11, but
> -test12pre works too) is applied...
Ok, I should actually attach the test11-final patch ;)
Christoph
--
Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX.
diff -uNr --exclud
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these
>> things appeared:
> It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other
> documentation sets
That could even be automated when this little patch (agai
Hello!
> They irritated you so much that you only noticed after six months ?
I really edit and even read skbuff.h not every day and even not every
month. Is this bad? 8)
"Irritated" is wrong word. "To get a scare" is closer to truth.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
> > Well, I am a fossil, of course, and like to read sources printed on paper
> > and all these pretentions to convert readbale text to hypertext irritate me.
> > But such deep thoughts eat even more expensive space on screen!
>
> So write a 4 line perl script to filter them out before printing ?
> BTW what is this? It is just a question, I missed even the moment, when these
> things appeared:
It allows us to generate man9 sets for that part of the kernel and other
documentation sets
> Well, I am a fossil, of course, and like to read sources printed on paper
> and all these pretentions t
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:41:22PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /**
> *kfree_skb - free an sk_buff
> *@skb: buffer to free
> *
> *Drop a reference to the buffer and free it if the usage count has
> *hit zero.
> */
>
> People, who need _literal_ translation from C to Eng
Hello!
> Kill it ;)
Great day! Nobody will cry that information sort of this:
* MUST NOT send ICMP errors in reply to:
* ICMP errors (OK)
* Broadcast/multicast datagrams (OK)
* MAC broadcasts (OK)
* Non-initial fragments (OK)
* Datagram with a source address that is
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 05:19:30PM +0100, Fabien Ribes wrote:
> Andi Kleen a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > >Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
> > >From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >Looking at Linux kernel
Andi Kleen a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> >Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
> >From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
> >each file. Is there a
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:28:15AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100
>From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>> No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this.
>
>The RFC eva
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this.
The RFC evaluation is also out of date and should be either redone
or removed.
I agree
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
>From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
>each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 s
Date:Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100
From: Fabien Ribes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 status as a
whole for a given kernel version ?
No, unfortunately nobod
Hi all,
Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in
each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 status as a
whole for a given kernel version ?
Thanks, Fabien
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
18 matches
Mail list logo
