On Thursday 15 March 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
[...]
>with "/bin/tar -f - >/tmp/test/", you ask bash to open the file
> "/tmp/test/" for write, then start tar and pass this file as its
> stdout. Obviously this is wrong. I think that what you're trying to do
> is send extracted files to
On Thursday 15 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Here is an example
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# dd if=00010.coyote._lib.1 bs=32k count=1
>> AMANDA: FILE 20070314104344 coyote /lib lev 1 comp .gz program
>> /bin/tar To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
>> dd if=
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:12:48PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >>Greetings;
> >> >>Someone
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Here is an example
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# dd if=00010.coyote._lib.1 bs=32k count=1
> AMANDA: FILE 20070314104344 coyote /lib lev 1 comp .gz program /bin/tar
> To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
> dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /bin/gzip -dc | /bin/tar -f -
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
>On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >>Greetings;
>> >>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>> >>
>> >>I now have my scripts more
On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>Greetings;
>>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>>
>>I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> >On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
>> >> The total number of patches between
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and
On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control,
Gene Heskett wrote:
Here is an example
[EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# dd if=00010.coyote._lib.1 bs=32k count=1
AMANDA: FILE 20070314104344 coyote /lib lev 1 comp .gz program /bin/tar
To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
dd if=tape bs=32k skip=1 | /bin/gzip -dc | /bin/tar -f - ...
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:12:48PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh
On Thursday 15 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Here is an example
[EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# dd if=00010.coyote._lib.1 bs=32k count=1
AMANDA: FILE 20070314104344 coyote /lib lev 1 comp .gz program
/bin/tar To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
dd if=tape bs=32k
On Thursday 15 March 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
[...]
with /bin/tar -f - /tmp/test/, you ask bash to open the file
/tmp/test/ for write, then start tar and pass this file as its
stdout. Obviously this is wrong. I think that what you're trying to do
is send extracted files to /tmp/test, which
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
> >> The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
> >> building kernels to
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
>> The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
>> building kernels to bisect
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this? The
>> total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
>> building kernels to bisect this till the middle of June at this rate.
On Tue, Mar 13,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this? The
> total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
> building kernels to bisect this till the middle of June at this rate.
4 billion patches
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>Greetings;
>>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>>
>>I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
>>kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>Greetings;
>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>
>I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
>kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
>behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when told to do a level 2 on
a directory tree that
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when told to do a level 2 on
a directory tree that
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when told
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this? The
total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
building kernels to bisect this till the middle of June at this rate.
4 billion patches
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this? The
total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
building kernels to bisect this till the middle of June at this rate.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
building kernels to bisect this till
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
building kernels to bisect this
28 matches
Mail list logo
