On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, David L. Nicol wrote:
> Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> > A more useful thing to fall out of the same hacking is loopback
> > mounting -- i.e. the same filesystem mounted multiple places. In
> > Linux-land I guess we call it 'mount --bind'.
> >
> > Peter
>
> Does this kind
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, John R Lenton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:25:10AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Wakko Warner]
> > > I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
> >
> > Al Viro likes Plan9 process-local namespaces. He seems to be trying to
> > move Linux in
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > > I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt
> > >
> > > Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before.
>
> I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
Direct request from HPA. Autofs can win from
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Wakko Warner wrote:
I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt
Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before.
I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
Direct request from HPA. Autofs can win from having that
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, John R Lenton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:25:10AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Wakko Warner]
I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
Al Viro likes Plan9 process-local namespaces. He seems to be trying to
move Linux in that direction.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, David L. Nicol wrote:
Peter Samuelson wrote:
A more useful thing to fall out of the same hacking is loopback
mounting -- i.e. the same filesystem mounted multiple places. In
Linux-land I guess we call it 'mount --bind'.
Peter
Does this kind of thing play
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> A more useful thing to fall out of the same hacking is loopback
> mounting -- i.e. the same filesystem mounted multiple places. In
> Linux-land I guess we call it 'mount --bind'.
>
> Peter
Does this kind of thing play nice with nfs and coda, in terms of
change
Peter Samuelson wrote:
A more useful thing to fall out of the same hacking is loopback
mounting -- i.e. the same filesystem mounted multiple places. In
Linux-land I guess we call it 'mount --bind'.
Peter
Does this kind of thing play nice with nfs and coda, in terms of
change
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:25:10AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Wakko Warner]
> > I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
>
> Al Viro likes Plan9 process-local namespaces. He seems to be trying to
> move Linux in that direction. In the past year he has been hacking the
>
> > > I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt
> >
> > Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before.
I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Samuelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael D. Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 6. February 2001 00:06
Subject: Re: OK to mount multiple FS in one dir?
>
> [Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Samuelson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Michael D. Crawford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6. February 2001 00:06
Subject: Re: OK to mount multiple FS in one dir?
[Michael D. Crawford]
I found I could mo
I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt
Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before.
I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:25:10AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Wakko Warner]
I have a question, why was this idea even considered?
Al Viro likes Plan9 process-local namespaces. He seems to be trying to
move Linux in that direction. In the past year he has been hacking the
semantics
[Michael D. Crawford]
> I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt
Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before.
> and they'd all show up as mounted at /mnt in the "mount" command, but
> if I unmounted one of them (only tried with the currently visible
> one),
[Michael D. Crawford]
I found I could mount three partitions on /mnt
Yes. New feature, appeared in the 2.4.0test series, or shortly before.
and they'd all show up as mounted at /mnt in the "mount" command, but
if I unmounted one of them (only tried with the currently visible
one), then it
I was groping around my FAT/NTFS directories from Linux, mounting and
unmounting them into
/mnt, and was suprised at some point that I got the message "/dev/sda5
already mounted or
/mnt busy". (I'm using a SCSI disk, use hda* for IDE).
Upon further examination, I found that I'd accidentally
I was groping around my FAT/NTFS directories from Linux, mounting and
unmounting them into
/mnt, and was suprised at some point that I got the message "/dev/sda5
already mounted or
/mnt busy". (I'm using a SCSI disk, use hda* for IDE).
Upon further examination, I found that I'd accidentally
18 matches
Mail list logo
