Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-30 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After some more testing it's entirely plausible (though unfortunately we don't have anything conclusive) that we have a hardware problem. Having added a new drive (hdc as reported below) and booted root=/dev/hdc2 with nothing mounted on hda, we have

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-30 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After some more testing it's entirely plausible (though unfortunately we don't have anything conclusive) that we have a hardware problem. Having added a new drive (hdc as reported below) and booted root=/dev/hdc2 with nothing mounted on hda, we have

Re: kernel oops with 2.4.3-xfs

2001-05-23 Thread Steve Lord
Hmm, we 'released' version 1 of XFS against a 2.4.2 base - and packaged it into a RedHat 7.1 Kernel RPM, we also have a development CVS tree currently running at 2.4.4. If you are running a production server with what you describe below, you might want to switch to one of the other two kernels I

kernel oops with 2.4.3-xfs

2001-05-23 Thread Gerald Weber
hi, i use kernel 2.4.3 with xfs (release 1) on a dell poweredge 2450. it happens about every week that the system completely hangs (network down,console does not accept any input,sysreq useless...). i think this has anything to do with xfs or other fs issues,because kupdated always uses about

kernel oops with 2.4.3-xfs

2001-05-23 Thread Gerald Weber
hi, i use kernel 2.4.3 with xfs (release 1) on a dell poweredge 2450. it happens about every week that the system completely hangs (network down,console does not accept any input,sysreq useless...). i think this has anything to do with xfs or other fs issues,because kupdated always uses about

Re: kernel oops with 2.4.3-xfs

2001-05-23 Thread Steve Lord
Hmm, we 'released' version 1 of XFS against a 2.4.2 base - and packaged it into a RedHat 7.1 Kernel RPM, we also have a development CVS tree currently running at 2.4.4. If you are running a production server with what you describe below, you might want to switch to one of the other two kernels I

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> However, in testing a directory with lots (~177000) of files, we get the >> following oops (copied by hand, and run through ksymoops on a Red Hat box >> since the Debian one segfaulted :( ) >Can you describe your testing beyond using a directory

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Lord
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] > > We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from > http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported > from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS.

Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS. However, in testing

Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS. However, in testing

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Steve Lord
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, [ I'm not subscribed to linux-xfs, please cc me ] We have managed to get a Debian potato system (with the 2.4 updates from http://people.debian.org/~bunk/debian plus xfs-tools which we imported from woody) to run 2.4.3-XFS.

Re: Oops with 2.4.3-XFS

2001-05-16 Thread Matt Bernstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 However, in testing a directory with lots (~177000) of files, we get the following oops (copied by hand, and run through ksymoops on a Red Hat box since the Debian one segfaulted :( ) Can you describe your testing beyond using a directory with