Re: Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-04-03 Thread Rob Landley
--- Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Summary: you had to use a *search engine* to find an > obscure piece of > coding information. Actually, I had to use a search engine to find a tangentially related howto that halfway through mentioned something in passing which gave me a clue of

Re: Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-04-03 Thread Rob Landley
--- Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Summary: you had to use a *search engine* to find an obscure piece of coding information. Actually, I had to use a search engine to find a tangentially related howto that halfway through mentioned something in passing which gave me a clue of

Re: Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-04-01 Thread Rusty Russell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: [ cut 50 lines ] > If I were to perhaps send linuxdoc.org a check or > something, might a day come to pass when learning to > do seemingly obvious things under linux does NOT > require fairly good forensic investigation skills? I > ask merely for

Re: Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-04-01 Thread Rusty Russell
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: [ cut 50 lines ] If I were to perhaps send linuxdoc.org a check or something, might a day come to pass when learning to do seemingly obvious things under linux does NOT require fairly good forensic investigation skills? I ask merely for information.

Re: Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-03-29 Thread Rob Landley
Yeah, I found it. While researching replacing the 2.2 kernel with 2.4 to get my proxy-oid to work, I stumbled accross the following section in the unofficial NAT-HOWTO (which is not on linuxdoc's website as far as I can tell). At this address:

Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-03-29 Thread Rob Landley
Help. I thought transparent proxying would allow some means for the recipient of the proxied connections to find out what their original destination port and socket address were. This does not seem to be the case. The socket structure only has one address and one socket, and those have the

Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-03-29 Thread Rob Landley
Help. I thought transparent proxying would allow some means for the recipient of the proxied connections to find out what their original destination port and socket address were. This does not seem to be the case. The socket structure only has one address and one socket, and those have the

Re: Original destination of transparent proxied connections?

2001-03-29 Thread Rob Landley
Yeah, I found it. While researching replacing the 2.2 kernel with 2.4 to get my proxy-oid to work, I stumbled accross the following section in the unofficial NAT-HOWTO (which is not on linuxdoc's website as far as I can tell). At this address: