On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> My fix for this problem is already sitting in Andrew's patch queue
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/11/79). Rich's patch still has a problem - you
> cannot call udf_discard_prealloc() from drop_inode() because it is called
> under inode_lock and thus you
On Thu 14-06-07 15:12:58, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rich Coe wrote:
> >
> > I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
> >
> > drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
> > released, where put_inode is called for
On Thu 14-06-07 15:12:58, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rich Coe wrote:
I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
My fix for this problem is already sitting in Andrew's patch queue
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/11/79). Rich's patch still has a problem - you
cannot call udf_discard_prealloc() from drop_inode() because it is called
under inode_lock and thus you
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rich Coe wrote:
>
> I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
>
> drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
> released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
Patch looks fine, but this late in the -rc series,
I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
Rich
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:48:03 -0500
Rich Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This
Hi Rich,
On Wed 13-06-07 15:48:03, Rich Coe wrote:
> This patch fixes directory and missing files corruption in fs/udf which
> occurs on all known 2.6 releases.
>
> The corruption occurs because blocks which were pre-alloc'd for a directory
> are released back to the fs freelist, but the
Hi Rich,
On Wed 13-06-07 15:48:03, Rich Coe wrote:
This patch fixes directory and missing files corruption in fs/udf which
occurs on all known 2.6 releases.
The corruption occurs because blocks which were pre-alloc'd for a directory
are released back to the fs freelist, but the inode's
I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
Rich
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:48:03 -0500
Rich Coe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Linus,
This
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rich Coe wrote:
I've updated the patch below to use drop_inode rather than put_inode.
drop_inode is only called when the last iput() reference to the inode is
released, where put_inode is called for every iput().
Patch looks fine, but this late in the -rc series, I'd
On 06/13/2007 04:48 PM, Rich Coe wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This patch fixes directory and missing files corruption in fs/udf which
> occurs on all known 2.6 releases.
>
> The corruption occurs because blocks which were pre-alloc'd for a directory
> are released back to the fs freelist, but the
Hi Linus,
This patch fixes directory and missing files corruption in fs/udf which
occurs on all known 2.6 releases.
The corruption occurs because blocks which were pre-alloc'd for a directory
are released back to the fs freelist, but the inode's alloc block information
is not updated to
Hi Linus,
This patch fixes directory and missing files corruption in fs/udf which
occurs on all known 2.6 releases.
The corruption occurs because blocks which were pre-alloc'd for a directory
are released back to the fs freelist, but the inode's alloc block information
is not updated to
On 06/13/2007 04:48 PM, Rich Coe wrote:
Hi Linus,
This patch fixes directory and missing files corruption in fs/udf which
occurs on all known 2.6 releases.
The corruption occurs because blocks which were pre-alloc'd for a directory
are released back to the fs freelist, but the inode's
14 matches
Mail list logo
